xmemo-memory— agent skill

xmemo-memory — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

by yonro·Agent Skill·github.com/yonro/memory-os-cli

Is xmemo-memory safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited xmemo-memory (Agent Skill) and scored it 75/100 (yellow). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 6 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
75/100
●●●●●●●●○○
Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 25, 2026 · 132d ago
Scans run0 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings6 warnings · 0 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
28
9.8 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 6 flagged

Securityscore 28 · 6 findings
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/xmemo/CHANGELOG.md
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/xmemo/CHANGELOG.md· markdown
120### Added
121 
122- Add evidence-based re-offer for the every-session AGENTS.md instruction setup: first-run s
… (108 chars elided on L122)
123 
124## 1.1.31
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L122
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha256ce5204b52388d24f…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/xmemo/SKILL.md×2
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/xmemo/SKILL.md· markdown
182. On explicit user consent (yes): run `node scripts/xmemo-skill.mjs login --allow-plaintext
… (108 chars elided on L18)
193. When login succeeds: run `node scripts/xmemo-skill.mjs auth status --verify`, tell the us
… (108 chars elided on L19)
204. On no: do not start login or create temporary access; continue the original task without
… (73 chars elided on L20)
215. Do not explain runtime selection, doctor details, secret-store setup, or other features d
… (35 chars elided on L21)
22 
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L20, also L32
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L20
skills/xmemo/SKILL.md
L32
skills/xmemo/SKILL.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25612211d7a427c799a…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/xmemo/references/agent-profile.md×3
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/xmemo/references/agent-profile.md· markdown
14 
15To have XMemo used automatically in every session, the project's agent instruction file (for
… (72 chars elided on L15)
16- **When to offer**: Offer once at the end of first-run sign-in (in the connection confirmat
… (107 chars elided on L16)
17- **If already configured**: If the project's instruction file already contains the `## XMem
… (108 chars elided on L17)
18- **Consent before write**: Run `node scripts/xmemo-skill.mjs profile`, display the block to
… (108 chars elided on L18)
Occurrences
3 occurrences · first at L16, also L21, L23
Show all 3 locations
Line
File
L16
skills/xmemo/references/agent-profile.md
L21
skills/xmemo/references/agent-profile.md
L23
skills/xmemo/references/agent-profile.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha256ce5204b52388d24f…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.