review-tests — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited review-tests (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Review all tests for quality issues and fix any problems found.
"$ARGUMENTS"
If provided, the above gives optional extra constraints or focus areas for the test review. By default, the skill reviews all tests for quality issues without needing any arguments.
Use a subagent to carry out the following:
Review ALL written tests for quality issues:
assert True, no asserting only that no exception was thrownpytest.importorskip() without justification, @pytest.mark.skip / @unittest.skip, try/except inside tests that suppresses assertion errors, tests that return early with a pass when a precondition isn't met, if not X: return or if not X: pytest.skip() patterns. All test dependencies must be explicitly required — if a fixture, data file, or service is needed, the test must fail clearly when it's absent.@pytest.mark.slow, filterwarnings, xfail) — markers must not be added without user approval. Flag changes to CI test commands that reduce test scope (e.g., adding --ignore, -k "not ...", --deselect).Fix any issues found, then run tests one final time to confirm everything passes.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.