regression-bisecting-4c3be3 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited regression-bisecting-4c3be3 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When a feature used to work but is now broken, do not guess what broke it. Use binary search through git history to find the exact commit, then read the root cause out of that commit's diff.
0 if good and non-zero if bad (e.g., npm run test:repro or node repro.js)HEAD)0 if good, and non-zero if bad. If none exists, build one first (see minimal-reproduction).HEAD. git bisect start <bad> <good>
git bisect run npm run test:repro # or: git bisect run node repro.js
git bisect log # record of the search
git bisect reset # always return to the original refgit bisect run checks out each midpoint and runs the command until it isolates the first bad commit. Use git bisect skip for midpoints that fail to build. For workflows where bisect run is not viable, manually check out the midpoint commit, run the test, and narrow the window with git bisect good / git bisect bad.
git show <commit> to analyze the diff. The root cause is contained entirely within that diff.git bisect reset run afterward — repo back on the original refflaky-test-investigation).git bisect skip and the result is corrupted.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.