context-retrieval-loop-7a0b85 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited context-retrieval-loop-7a0b85 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Gather context before any refactor or maintenance task. Prevents breaking undetected callers or missing test coverage.
# Find callers and references
rg "<symbol-name>" --type ts --type js -l
rg "<symbol-name>" --glob "*.py" -lStop here if you can confirm the symbol is unused (no results).
Read the target file and its tests. Find all callers:
rg "import.*<module>" -l
rg "<function-name>" --glob "*.test.*" -lStop here if you understand the change scope and existing test coverage.
# Check if symbol appears in build or config
rg "<symbol-name>" *.config.* tsconfig.json Makefile -l 2>/dev/nullCheck for re-exports, barrel files, and public API surfaces.
Context gathered:
<file-path> — <reason>
Blast radius:
<N> callers in <N> files
Tests covering this code: <yes/no/partial>
Missing context (if any):
<what is still unclear>Do not start a refactor without knowing the blast radius. If callers are unclear after Cycle 3, stop and report.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.