context-retrieval-loop-33bc95 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited context-retrieval-loop-33bc95 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Gather documentation context before writing or updating docs. Prevents duplicating existing content or violating project conventions.
# Find existing docs
find . -name "*.md" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -30
rg "<topic>" docs/ *.md -l 2>/dev/nullStop here if you find the existing doc that covers this topic.
Read the source files the docs will describe. Find existing docs for the same area:
rg "<module-name>" docs/ -l
cat README.md | head -60Stop here if you understand the scope of what needs to be written or updated.
ls docs/ .github/ 2>/dev/null
cat AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null | head -40Check: Is there a doc style guide? A template? A contribution guide with doc requirements?
Context gathered:
<file-path> — <reason>
Missing context (if any):
<what is still unclear>State gaps. Do not write documentation that contradicts undiscovered existing content.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.