neural-inspect — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited neural-inspect (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Deep-dive into a specific code element — see its full context in the knowledge graph.
Via MCP tool (neural-memory configured as MCP server in Claude Code):
Tool: neural_inspect
{ "node_id": "module::ClassName.method_name" }or by name:
{ "node_name": "method_name", "show_code": true, "trace_calls": true }Via Python (working directly in the project):
import asyncio
from neural_memory.server import neural_inspect, InspectInput
# By node_id (most precise — get from neural_query results)
asyncio.run(neural_inspect(InspectInput(node_id="module::ClassName.method_name")))
# By name (fuzzy match)
asyncio.run(neural_inspect(InspectInput(node_name="method_name", show_code=True, trace_calls=True)))| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
node_id | str | None | Exact node ID from query results (most precise) |
node_name | str | None | Name to fuzzy-search (use if you don't have the ID) |
project_root | str | "." | Project root directory |
show_code | bool | false | Include raw source code in output |
trace_calls | bool | false | Show full upstream/downstream call chains |
Provide either node_id or node_name — node_id is preferred when available.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.