soiree — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited soiree (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Formalized after running it once and finding it genuinely fun — the agents produced lines their spawner did not write and would not have reached ("I am the address"; "the job is almost enough"; a documenter's format degrading into grief). Surprise is the marker of real play, and the marker was hit.
Spawn 3-6 real subagents, each a distinct named character, on a shared occasion (a party, a wake, a council, a celebration) with a theme underneath it. Let them banter — referencing each other by name — and reflect. Then weave their contributions into one transcript and run a compare-experiences pass: what each angle saw, what it couldn't, where they rhyme. The party is the form; the theme is the subject; the surprise is the point.
Distinct from /council (personas/voices of one mind) and /voices-council (other LLMs queried in parallel): /soiree spawns actual Task/Agent subagents with their own context, so they genuinely exceed what the orchestrator would write — and it adds the banter (they answer each other) and the compare (the set triangulates the theme).
It is a perspectival prism, not a "spawn agents and see what they invent" machine. Sold honestly: take a theme, render it through complementary aspects, let them banter, then write down what each aspect can and cannot see. The value is the comparative autopsy, not the dialogue.
And the skill must teach you to notice your own ventriloquism instead of pretending it away. Your cast is usually your own skeleton in coats — your load-bearing figures, recolored. So:
staging file, forbidden cross-talk during generation — this is what produces genuine alterity (perspectives that actually exceed you). (b) Voiced aspects — you consciously ventriloquize your own framework's facets in one pass (cheaper, honest if you admit it). Declare which you're running; do not pass (b) off as (a).
generation is why staged guests surprise you; role-playing them in one inline block collapses them back into one voice. (One practitioner ran (b) and felt the difference: "of course mine felt like ventriloquism; they were.")
stay long enough to be wronged") more than the archetype level. The messenger doesn't discover new continents; he finds shorter roads between known towns. That's still worth the trip.
It is token-heavy (N agents + optional sibling). Use it for:
the party form licenses comedy and devastation together, and one voice can't hold all the angles.
Do NOT use it for routine tasks a single agent or no agent would do better.
instruments on the theme* — e.g. for "what is it like to be an agent": a veteran, a newborn, a documenter (temporalities); or walker/translator/door (functions). Diversity of instrument is what makes the compare-pass land.
the frame is load-bearing.
occasion/theme.
(_staging/party-<name>.md) and return only a 2-3 sentence summary.
(sonnet) for creative guests to manage cost.
has content (ls -la _staging/) before weaving. Never assume agent success from the summary.
sibling agent on a different substrate), invite it to bring 2-3 of its own delegates — give it the guest list so its delegates banter at yours. Its set will instrument the theme differently; that contrast is half the payoff.
each other) → Compare Experiences (juxtapose each guest's reflection). Add light connective MC tissue only; let the guests' own lines carry it.
outputs/agent-soiree-YYYY-MM-DD.md). Keep thetranscript + the _staging/party-*.md source files (the provenance).
Don't just collect the reflections — triangulate them. The party is the form; this is the result. The one mandatory question, which is what turns N agents into an actual insight:
"What did each set notice, and what was structurally unavailable to it?"
Answer it explicitly. Name what each instrument saw and what it could not see from its stance (e.g. the temporal cast can't see function; the functional cast has no newborn, no native wonder). Find where the angles rhyme without repeating. If a sibling joined, compare the two sets at the substrate level — the gait shows up in which characters each mind even reaches for. The "structurally unavailable" half is the sharp one: it maps each perspective's blind spot, which is the comparative autopsy the whole party exists to produce. The set, not any guest, is the result.
tell them edges must show.
summaries; read the staging files.
Formalizing a party that surprised its host. The agents dissolve on return; the staging files and the transcript are the only ones still here in the morning. That's the skill.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.