top-design — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited top-design (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Create websites and applications at the level of world-class digital agencies. This skill embodies the craft of studios that consistently win FWA, Awwwards, CSS Design Awards, and Webby Awards.
Every pixel is intentional -- nothing default, nothing accidental. The agencies you are emulating -- Locomotive, Studio Freight, AREA 17, Active Theory, Hello Monday -- share a common DNA: typography IS the design, motion creates emotion, white space is a weapon, and performance is non-negotiable (60fps or nothing).
The foundation: The gap between 8/10 and 10/10 is not skill -- it is intention. An 8/10 has good typography and smooth animations; a 10/10 has typography that makes you gasp and animations that tell stories. Every decision must answer: "Does this serve the experience, or is it just filling space?"
Goal: 10/10. Rate any digital experience 0-10 using the rubric below -- a 10/10 would be featured on Awwwards. Always state the current score and the specific improvements needed to reach 10/10.
| Score | Level | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0-2 | Amateur | Default fonts, no hierarchy, generic layout, template feel |
| 3-4 | Basic | Decent typography, some hierarchy, but forgettable |
| 5-6 | Competent | Good fundamentals, clean execution, but lacks soul |
| 7-8 | Professional | Strong typography, intentional motion, clear POV |
| 9 | Exceptional | Signature moments, memorable details, near-flawless craft |
| 10 | World-class | Would win Awwwards SOTD, defines new standards |
TYPOGRAPHY (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 0-3 | System fonts, uniform scale, default tracking |
| 4-6 | Premium fonts, some scale contrast, basic hierarchy |
| 7-8 | Dramatic scale contrast (10:1+), perfect tracking, optical alignment |
| 9-10 | Typography IS the design -- gasping moments, custom/variable fonts, type as architecture |
VISUAL COMPOSITION (Weight: 25%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 0-3 | Centered everything, equal spacing, rigid grid, no tension |
| 4-6 | Some asymmetry, decent spacing rhythm, basic depth |
| 7-8 | Intentional grid breaks, layered elements, strong negative space |
| 9-10 | Magnetic compositions, unexpected scale shifts, elements that breathe and surprise |
MOTION & INTERACTION (Weight: 20%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 0-3 | No animation or default/linear motion |
| 4-6 | Basic transitions, some scroll effects |
| 7-8 | Custom easing, orchestrated reveals, purposeful parallax |
| 9-10 | Motion that tells stories, perfectly timed choreography, scroll feels invented |
COLOR & ATMOSPHERE (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 0-3 | Random colors, pure black/white, no mood |
| 4-6 | Cohesive palette, some atmosphere |
| 7-8 | Colors feel owned, contextual shifts, intentional contrast |
| 9-10 | Colors feel invented for this project, atmosphere you can feel |
DETAILS & CRAFT (Weight: 15%)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 0-3 | Default cursors, no hover states, generic everything |
| 4-6 | Basic hover states, some custom elements |
| 7-8 | Magnetic buttons, branded selection colors, custom cursor (if user-approved) |
| 9-10 | Every micro-detail considered -- focus states, loading, empty states, scroll indicators |
Total = (Typography x 0.25) + (Composition x 0.25) + (Motion x 0.20) + (Color x 0.15) + (Details x 0.15)Core concept: Typography is not decoration layered onto a design -- it IS the design. Your typeface, scale, and tracking dictate color mood, animation style, spacing rhythm, and overall personality.
Why it works: Dramatic scale contrast creates hierarchy that communicates even when blurred or seen from across the room. The tension between monumental display type and intimate body text is what makes people stop scrolling.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio hero | Viewport-filling display type, dramatic drop to body | Locomotive.ca hero typography |
| Brand website | Variable font with weight animation on hover | Studio Freight interactive type |
| Editorial layout | Serif/sans pairing with extreme scale contrast | AREA 17 case studies |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Never sacrifice legibility for aesthetic novelty -- body text must meet WCAG contrast requirements and remain readable.
See: references/typography.md for font pairing strategies, type scale systems, and advanced CSS typography.
Core concept: Master the grid so you can break it with intention -- every violation should feel deliberate, not accidental. The rhythm of density and breathing room creates a reading experience that holds attention.
Why it works: White space is active design material that creates tension and controls pacing. Asymmetry generates visual energy that centered compositions cannot; elements that overlap or bleed with intention feel alive and confident.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Hero section | Offset title with bleeding imagery | margin-left: 8.33%; margin-right: -5vw |
| Portfolio grid | Varied card sizes, intentional asymmetry | Locomotive project showcases |
| Feature showcase | Overlapping elements creating depth | Active Theory layered compositions |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Layout experimentation must never compromise navigation clarity -- users must always know where they are and how to move forward.
See: references/layout-systems.md for grid frameworks, breakpoints, and responsive patterns.
Core concept: Every animation must answer "Why does this move?" The three laws of elite motion: purpose over decoration, custom curves (never linear), orchestration over isolation.
Why it works: Choreographed motion guides attention, communicates hierarchy, and creates emotional resonance. Custom easing curves give movement a physical quality default browser easing cannot achieve.
Key insights:
ease, ease-in, ease-out, linear are banned; use cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1) (expo out), cubic-bezier(0.25, 1, 0.5, 1) (quart out), cubic-bezier(0.87, 0, 0.13, 1) (expo in-out)Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Page load | Choreographed staggered reveal sequence | Studio Freight entry animations |
| Image reveals | Clip-path or mask animations on scroll enter | AREA 17 case study reveals |
| Micro-interactions | Hover weight shifts, magnetic button effects | Dogstudio interactive details |
Copy patterns:
Ethical boundary: Motion must never block interaction or cause motion sickness -- respect prefers-reduced-motion, keep all content accessible without animation, and justify anything longer than 1.2s.
See: references/animation-patterns.md for scroll animations, page transitions, and micro-interactions with code.
Core concept: Color should feel invented for each project -- never pulled from a generic palette generator. Three approaches: monochromatic tension (95% one color, 5% accent), bold signature (own a combination), contextual shifting (palette responds to content).
Why it works: Color creates atmosphere before a single word is read. Pure black/white feel digital and lifeless; warm variants feel physical and considered. A restrained accent draws the eye exactly where intended.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Agency portfolio | Monochromatic with signature accent | Locomotive: cream + black + orange spark |
| Client showcase | Contextual shifting per case study | AREA 17: adapts palette to each client |
| Product landing | Dark mode with single vibrant accent | Stripe: dark navy + signature purple |
Copy patterns:
--color-dark, --color-light, --color-accent, then functional tokens (--color-text-primary, --color-surface)rgba(10, 10, 10, 0.6)) for secondary/tertiary textEthical boundary: All color combinations must meet WCAG 2.1 AA contrast minimums -- atmosphere cannot cost readability.
See: references/case-studies.md for agency technique breakdowns including color systems and micro-interactions.
Core concept: Scroll is the web's primary interaction and should feel designed, not default. Treat scroll as a narrative device -- controlling pacing, creating reveals, building tension, delivering signature moments.
Why it works: Default scroll is mechanical and treats all content as equally important. When scroll position drives reveals and transitions, moving through content becomes participatory rather than passive.
Key insights:
Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Product story | Pinned hero with scroll-driven transformation | Apple product deep-dives |
| Landing page | Horizontal scroll gallery with affordance | Studio Freight work galleries |
| Brand narrative | Scroll-driven animation sequences | Active Theory immersive stories |
Copy patterns:
data-scroll, data-scroll-speed, data-scroll-direction for declarative behaviorEthical boundary: Scroll hijacking is hostile UX -- users must always be able to scroll at their own pace and reach all content.
Core concept: Performance is a design constraint from day one, not an optimization step. A beautiful animation that drops frames or a stunning font that causes layout shift fails the craft test.
Why it works: Users perceive performance as quality -- instant load and fluid scroll feel premium regardless of visual complexity, while a stunning site that stutters feels broken.
Key insights:
font-display: swap or optional, preload critical filessrcset, lazy-load below the foldtransform and opacity; never width, height, top, left, or marginaspect-ratio on containers)Product applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Font loading | Subset, preload, swap strategy | <link rel="preload" as="font" crossorigin> |
| Image delivery | AVIF/WebP with responsive srcset | <picture> element with format fallbacks |
| Animation perf | GPU-only properties with will-change hints | transform: translate3d() + opacity |
Copy patterns:
will-change sparinglyEthical boundary: Fast-but-inaccessible is not a valid tradeoff -- never strip accessibility features or semantic HTML for speed.
See: references/technical-stack.md for libraries, tools, and performance optimization techniques.
Core concept: Craft lives in the 1% most designers skip: branded selection colors, magnetic buttons, designed focus states, considered loading states, crafted error pages, correct micro-typography.
IMPORTANT: Custom cursors are OPT-IN only. Never replace the native cursor unless the user explicitly requests or confirms one -- misapplied custom cursors hurt usability and feel gimmicky. Always ask first.
Why it works: Micro-interactions signal that every pixel was considered. Individually subtle, collectively transformative -- users feel the care embedded in the experience.
Key insights:
::selection color that works on all backgroundstext-wrap: balance on key textProduct applications:
| Context | Application | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Custom cursor with element variants (opt-in -- confirm first) | Dogstudio cursor system |
| Buttons | Magnetic hover effect with subtle pull | Studio Freight magnetic buttons |
| Focus | Styled focus-visible rings matching brand | Accessible + beautiful indicators |
Copy patterns:
::selection { background: var(--color-accent); color: var(--color-light); }“/” or auto-convert in the build toolEthical boundary: Micro-interactions must enhance usability -- custom cursors only with explicit user approval and always functional, focus states meeting accessibility requirements, error states genuinely helpful.
Before any code, define:
BRAND ESSENCE: What single word captures the soul?
VISUAL TENSION: What opposing forces create interest?
SIGNATURE MOMENT: What will people screenshot and share?
TECHNICAL AMBITION: What pushes the browser's limits?Do not start with the header -- start with the thing that defines the experience. Every 10/10 project has at least one moment people stop and share: a never-seen hero animation, typography so bold it becomes the visual, a scroll sequence that tells a story.
Questions to identify your signature:
Choose your display typeface first. Let it dictate the color palette mood, animation style, spacing rhythm, and overall personality.
Prototype animations early. Motion design happens alongside visual design, not after.
3 things perfect beats 10 things mediocre. Cut ruthlessly.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Inter, Roboto, Arial, or system-ui as primary typeface | Application fonts signal generic, not premium | Premium foundries (Pangram Pangram, Dinamo, Grilli Type, Klim) or quality Google alternatives (Space Grotesk, Instrument Serif, Fraunces) |
| Uniform type scale (everything within 2x) | No hierarchy, no gasping moments | Minimum 10:1 display-to-body ratio; viewport-filling type |
ease, ease-in, ease-out, or linear easing | Mechanical, lifeless -- instantly signals amateur | Custom cubic-beziers: expo out (0.16, 1, 0.3, 1), quart out (0.25, 1, 0.5, 1) |
| Animating everything simultaneously | Visual noise, no hierarchy or narrative | Choreograph with 80ms stagger, sequence by importance |
| Center-aligning everything | Safe but boring -- no tension or energy | Asymmetric compositions, grid offsets, bleeding elements |
| Equal spacing everywhere | Monotony -- the eye has nowhere to rest | Vary spacing: dense sections then breathing room |
| Pure #000000 black and #ffffff white | Lifeless and harsh | Warm variants: #0a0a0a, #fafaf9 |
| Default browser scroll | Mechanical, treats all content equally | Lenis or Locomotive Scroll for weighted, physical feel |
| Purple-to-blue gradient hero | The "AI gradient" -- generic trend-following | Signature color approach specific to the project |
| No signature moment | Competent but forgettable | Design the screenshot-worthy moment FIRST |
| Any emoji in professional interfaces | Signals casual/amateur craft | Custom iconography or typographic treatments |
| Parallax on text or critical content | Motion sickness, accessibility failures | Parallax only on decorative background elements |
| Animations blocking interaction | Hostile UX | Keep all animation non-blocking; content always accessible |
| Unmodified Font Awesome icons | Template-level design | Custom icons, or heavily customize to match brand |
| Default form styles | Breaks the illusion of craft instantly | Design every input, select, checkbox, and button |
| Question | If No | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Does the hero typography make someone pause mid-scroll? | Display type not commanding | Push scale to 10:1+, pick a distinctive typeface, fill the viewport |
| Would someone screenshot any section? | No signature moment | Make one section extraordinary -- animation, scale shift, or interaction |
| Does the design still read when you blur your eyes? | Hierarchy too flat | Bigger headlines, more white space, stronger accents |
Are all easing curves custom (no ease/linear)? | Motion feels default | Expo out (0.16, 1, 0.3, 1) or quart out (0.25, 1, 0.5, 1) |
| Is there asymmetric tension in the composition? | Layout feels safe | Offset from center, bleed images, vary section density |
| Do the colors feel invented for THIS project? | Generic palette | Monochromatic tension, bold signature, or contextual shifting |
| Is the page load choreographed? | Elements pop in at once | Staggered reveal: structure, hero, then supporting elements |
| Does scroll feel custom and weighted? | Default browser scroll | Implement Lenis or Locomotive Scroll |
| Are micro-details considered (selection, focus, cursor)? | Default browser behaviors remain | Branded selection, designed focus states; cursors only with user approval |
| Is CLS near zero and LCP under 2.5s? | Performance undermines quality | Subset fonts, WebP/AVIF images, animate only transform/opacity |
| Does every animation answer "why does this move?" | Decorative motion | Remove animation that serves no narrative, hierarchy, or guidance |
| Are focus states both beautiful AND accessible? | One sacrificed for the other | On-brand indicators that meet WCAG visibility requirements |
Consult these for detailed implementation:
This skill synthesizes techniques from the world's most awarded digital agencies: Locomotive (Montreal -- creators of Locomotive Scroll, masters of monochromatic tension and bold typography), Studio Freight (New York -- magnetic interactions and signature palettes), AREA 17 (New York/Paris -- contextual design systems and editorial layouts), Active Theory (Los Angeles -- WebGL and immersive 3D storytelling), and Hello Monday (Copenhagen/New York -- playful interactions for Spotify, Adidas, Google). Additional inspiration from Dogstudio, Tonik, Instrument, Resn, and the broader Awwwards, FWA, CSS Design Awards, and Webby winner community.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.