agent-debate — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited agent-debate (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A bounded adversarial review of one consequential trade-off. Debate makes the evidence visible to the decision maker; it does not settle truth by vote and does not authorize implementation.
Do not debate a factual question that a direct check can settle, a naming preference, or a decision an authorized human already made.
positions as testable statements, shared evidence paths, and the criteria for judging. Template: references/debate_protocol.md.
reviewer lanes in parallel, one position each, both on astrong model tier, both read-only, both with the same packet. Each argues the strongest form of its side and cites evidence.
the cap allows one, answers the other side's strongest point. In harness mode the policy's max_cycles limit sets the cap; evaluate the policy before each reviewer spawn.
disagreement.
The primary-agent, or a separate synthesizer with no search tools, writes:
Nothing is implemented and no canonical memory changes until the human decides. If the outcome is worth keeping, write a memory proposal as described in agent-context-budget.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.