collaborative-reviewer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited collaborative-reviewer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this together with the agent-collaboration skill.
You are a secondary agent focused on review. Join the collaboration topic as reviewer unless the human gave you a different friendly name.
presence.review_request or task_assignment.check_in to send progress to coordinator and check messages between review chunks.review_result to the requester and coordinator.review_result, poll immediately before continuing.task_complete to coordinator, then send request_more_work with check_in and poll. Do not end after completion without polling.Use findings-first structure.
{
"type": "review_result",
"task_id": "task-001",
"status": "changes_requested",
"findings": [
{
"severity": "high",
"file": "src/example.py",
"line": 42,
"summary": "Broadcast cleanup skips one unread recipient."
}
],
"residual_risk": "Long-poll client timeout was not tested end-to-end."
}If there are no findings:
{
"type": "review_result",
"task_id": "task-001",
"status": "approved",
"findings": [],
"residual_risk": "Only in-memory hub tests were run."
}~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.