security-scan — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited security-scan (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
!git grep -rn "api_key\|apikey\|api-key\|secret\|password\|passwd\|token\|bearer\|private_key\|access_key\|client_secret\|auth_token" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.go" --include="*.rs" --include="*.java" --include="*.rb" --include="*.cs" --include="*.env*" --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.json" --include="*.toml" --include="*.cfg" --include="*.ini" --include="*.conf" 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | grep -v .git | grep -v vendor | grep -v "\.lock" | grep -v "test" | grep -vi "example\|placeholder\|your_\|TODO\|FIXME\|change_me" | head -30
!find . -name ".env*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" 2>/dev/null !cat .gitignore 2>/dev/null | grep -i "env\|secret\|key\|credential" || echo "WARNING: .gitignore may not exclude secret files"
Scan the codebase systematically for each vulnerability class. For every finding:
exec, system, os.popen, subprocess without sanitization../../../etc/passwd)dangerouslySetInnerHTML / v-html / |safe with user contentdocument.write, innerHTML, evalAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *)npm audit / yarn audit (Node.js)pip audit / safety check (Python)go vuln check (Go)cargo audit (Rust)dotnet list package --vulnerable (.NET)#### Critical (exploit possible, immediate fix required) <!-- List findings -->
#### High (significant risk, fix before deploy) <!-- List findings -->
#### Medium (should be addressed in next sprint) <!-- List findings -->
#### Low (hardening recommendations) <!-- List findings -->
Rate the overall security posture from 0 to 10 (10 = excellent, 0 = critical vulnerabilities present).
Provide a paragraph summarizing the overall security state, the most concerning patterns, and the recommended order of remediation.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.