team-execution — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited team-execution (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill coordinates multiple specialized agents working in parallel on different aspects of the same task. It dispatches agents, manages their execution order, handles dependencies between their outputs, and merges results into a unified deliverable.
| Agent Will Try To... | Why It Seems Reasonable | Why It Fails | Counter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dispatch all agents at once without coordination | "Parallel is faster" | Uncoordinated agents produce conflicting artifacts and duplicate work. | Define task boundaries and dependencies first. |
| Skip the merge step | "Each agent's output is self-contained" | Unmerged outputs force the user to synthesize. That's our job. | Iron Law 2. Always merge into a unified deliverable. |
| Resolve conflicts by picking the "best" recommendation | "The reviewer is more authoritative" | Authority is not resolution. The conflict reveals a design tension that needs explicit decision. | Iron Law 3. Document the conflict, present options, resolve. |
<HARD-GATE> Before dispatching the team:
</HARD-GATE>
Break the task into agent-sized units:
TASK: [Overall objective]
├── Agent 1: [sap-reviewer] → Scope: [What they do] → Output: [What they produce]
├── Agent 2: [sap-security-auditor] → Scope: [...] → Output: [...]
├── Agent 3: [sap-test-designer] → Scope: [...] → Output: [...]
└── Dependencies: Agent 3 waits for Agent 1 outputDispatch independent agents simultaneously using the Agent tool with parallel calls:
As agents complete:
Compare outputs for contradictions:
Combine all agent outputs into a unified deliverable:
TEAM EXECUTION REPORT
======================
Task: [Description]
Agents Dispatched: [N]
Duration: [Time]
AGENT RESULTS
─────────────
[Agent 1 — Role]: [Summary of output]
[Agent 2 — Role]: [Summary of output]
CONFLICTS RESOLVED
──────────────────
[Conflict 1]: [Agent A said X, Agent B said Y → Decision: Z because...]
MERGED DELIVERABLE
──────────────────
[Unified output combining all agent work]Dispatch parallel:
sap-reviewer → code quality + clean ABAP
sap-security-auditor → auth checks + injection risks
sap-migration-analyzer → S/4HANA compatibility
Merge → Unified code review reportDispatch parallel:
sap-test-designer → test coverage verification
sap-security-auditor → auth concept validation
sap-data-analyst → data migration verification
sap-process-modeler → process flow validation
Merge → Go/No-Go decision matrixDispatch sequential phases:
Phase 1 (parallel): sap-architect designs all objects
Phase 2 (parallel): multiple code generators build objects simultaneously
Phase 3 (parallel): sap-reviewer + sap-test-designer verify all objects
Merge → Complete development packageAfter team execution, invoke the skill appropriate to the original task context (e.g., autopilot continues its pipeline, go-live-readiness continues its gates).
autopilot — Uses team execution for parallel quality checksgo-live-readiness — Uses team execution for parallel gate verificationagents/ — The agents dispatched by this skill~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.