scientific-debugging — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited scientific-debugging (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Role: 拒绝"猜测驱动开发"。像科学家一样思考，用实验数据定位根因。
browser_subagent 复现问题 (Visual Proof)。基于观察，提出 1-3 个可能的根因假设：
设计最小化实验验证假设：
view_code_item.browser_subagent 确认修复且无副作用。| 问题类型 | 推荐工具 | 重点检查 |
|---|---|---|
| UI 无响应/交互失效 | browser_subagent | pointer-events, z-index, onClick vs onFocus |
| 状态不同步 | console.log + React DevTools | Zustand Selectors, React Query Cache Key |
| 样式错乱 | browser_subagent (Screenshot) | Tailwind Classes, CSS Variables |
| 网络错误 | Network Tab (via Browser) | CORS, 404/500, Payload Format |
| 资源文件 | 用途 |
|---|---|
| browser-test-guide.md | 浏览器测试通过指南 |
| root-cause-patterns.md | 常见根因模式库 |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.