token-budget — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited token-budget (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Her agent cagri token harcar. Butce yonetimi olmadan maliyetler kontrolsuz buyur.
| Model | Input (1M token) | Output (1M token) | Cache Read (1M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opus 4.6 | $15.00 | $75.00 | $1.50 |
| Sonnet 4.6 | $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.30 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.80 | $4.00 | $0.08 |
| Agent Tipi | Ortalama Token/Cagri | Ortalama Maliyet | Notlar |
|---|---|---|---|
| scout (arastirma) | 15K-50K | $0.15-0.75 | Cok dosya okur |
| code-reviewer | 10K-30K | $0.10-0.45 | Diff boyutuna bagli |
| architect | 20K-60K | $0.30-0.90 | Derin dusunme gerektirir |
| spark (quick fix) | 3K-10K | $0.03-0.15 | En verimli |
| kraken (TDD) | 30K-100K | $0.45-1.50 | Test + implement |
| sleuth (debug) | 20K-80K | $0.30-1.20 | Bug karmasikligina bagli |
| verifier | 5K-15K | $0.05-0.22 | Build + test calistirma |
| security-reviewer | 10K-40K | $0.15-0.60 | Tarama derinligine bagli |
| planner | 15K-40K | $0.22-0.60 | Plan buyuklugune bagli |
KUCUK IS (bug fix, kucuk feature):
Beklenen: 50K-150K token
Butce: $0.50-2.00
Agent sayisi: 2-4
ORTA IS (feature, refactoring):
Beklenen: 200K-500K token
Butce: $3.00-7.00
Agent sayisi: 4-8
BUYUK IS (yeni modul, buyuk refactor):
Beklenen: 500K-2M token
Butce: $7.00-30.00
Agent sayisi: 8-15
SWARM (tam ekip):
Beklenen: 1M-5M token
Butce: $15.00-75.00
Agent sayisi: 15-30Gunluk 3-5 session x 30 gun:
Hafif kullanim (vibe coding):
~100K token/gun = $1.50/gun = ~$45/ay
Normal kullanim (aktif gelistirme):
~500K token/gun = $7.50/gun = ~$225/ay
Yogun kullanim (tam ekip, swarm):
~2M token/gun = $30/gun = ~$900/ay
Claude Max abone ise:
Sabit $200/ay -- token limiti var ama birim maliyet yok
ROI: Normal kullanim ustu her sey Max ile karliOpus kullan:
- Mimari kararlar (architect)
- Karmasik debug (sleuth)
- Guvenlik analizi (security-reviewer)
- Kritik code review
Sonnet kullan:
- Genel gelistirme (kraken, spark)
- Rutin review (code-reviewer)
- Dokumantasyon (technical-writer)
- Test yazma (tdd-guide)
Sonuc: %40-60 maliyet dususu, %5-10 kalite kaybıYAPMA: 5 dosyayi tamamen okuyup agent'a gonder
YAP: Sadece ilgili fonksiyonlari gonder
YAPMA: Her seferinde tum CLAUDE.md'yi inject et
YAP: Sadece ilgili kurallari sec
YAPMA: Agent'a "her seyi kontrol et" de
YAP: Spesifik kontrol listesi ver
Token tasarrufu: %30-50PAHALI YOLDAN GITME:
architect (60K) + kraken (100K) + verifier (15K) = 175K token
VERIMLI YOL:
spark (10K) + verifier (10K) = 20K token
(Kucuk is icin spark yeterli, architect/kraken gereksiz)
Kural: Is buyuklugune uygun agent secAyni dosyayi tekrar tekrar okuma:
Ilk okuma: 10K token (tam fiyat)
Cache hit: 10K token (%90 indirimli)
Strateji: Session basinda ilgili dosyalari bir kere oku,
sonraki agent'lar cache'ten okusunPARALEL (daha pahali ama hizli):
3 agent ayni anda = 3x token ama 3x hizli
Kullan: Deadline varsa, bagimsiz isler
SEQUENTIAL (daha ucuz):
Agent 1 bitir → ciktisini Agent 2'ye ver
Kullan: Butce kisitliysa, bagimli islerROI = (Tasarruf edilen sure x saat ucreti) / Agent maliyeti
Ornek: code-reviewer
Maliyet: ~$0.30/review
Tasarruf: ~15 dk/review (manual review vs)
Saat ucreti: $50/saat
ROI: ($12.50) / ($0.30) = 41x
Ornek: sleuth (bug investigation)
Maliyet: ~$0.75/investigation
Tasarruf: ~45 dk/bug (manual debug vs)
ROI: ($37.50) / ($0.75) = 50x
Ornek: architect (buyuk plan)
Maliyet: ~$0.90/plan
Tasarruf: ~2 saat (manual planning vs)
ROI: ($100) / ($0.90) = 111x| Siralama | Agent | ROI | Neden |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | architect | 111x | Buyuk zaman tasarrufu, dusuk maliyet |
| 2 | sleuth | 50x | Bug investigation cok zaman alir |
| 3 | code-reviewer | 41x | Her commit icin gerekli |
| 4 | verifier | 35x | Otomatik quality gate |
| 5 | spark | 30x | Kucuk isler icin cok verimli |
| Agent | ROI | Neden | Oneri |
|---|---|---|---|
| scout (gereksiz arama) | 5x | Bazen cok dosya okur, az bilgi bulur | Spesifik soru sor |
| kraken (kucuk is) | 8x | TDD overhead kucuk isler icin fazla | Kucuk is = spark |
| designer (sadece oneri) | 3x | Oneri verir ama implement etmez | Frontend-dev yeterli |
# Token Harcama Raporu - [Tarih]
## Ozet
- Toplam token: XXX,XXX
- Tahmini maliyet: $XX.XX
- Agent sayisi: X
- Session suresi: X saat
## Agent Bazli Dagilim
| Agent | Token | Maliyet | Is | ROI |
|-------|------:|--------:|---|----|
| architect | 45K | $0.67 | Auth redesign plani | 111x |
| kraken | 85K | $1.27 | Implementation | 25x |
| code-reviewer | 20K | $0.30 | Review | 41x |
| verifier | 12K | $0.18 | Final check | 35x |
| **TOPLAM** | **162K** | **$2.42** | | |
## Optimizasyon Onerisi
- kraken yerine spark kullanilabilirdi (-70K token)
- architect ciktisi daha spesifik olabilirdi (-15K token)
- Potansiyel tasarruf: %52~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.