saas-launch-checklist — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited saas-launch-checklist (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A structured checklist for shipping a SaaS product to production with confidence. Every item exists because someone skipped it and regretted it.
npm audit / pip-audit / trivy shows zero critical CVEs/terms, acceptance recorded at signup/privacy, covers data collection, retention, and third partiesquarantine or reject, verified with mail-tester.com/unsubscribe endpoint works, preference center availableCache-Control and ETag headersBuild this dashboard before launch. Every panel answers a specific question.
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| SaaS Launch Dashboard |
+---------------------------+-------------------------+
| Request Rate (req/s) | Error Rate (%) |
| Normal: 10-50/s | Target: < 1% |
| Alert: > 200/s | Alert: > 2% |
+---------------------------+-------------------------+
| p95 Latency (ms) | Active Users (real-time) |
| Target: < 200ms | Shows WebSocket/polling |
| Alert: > 500ms | count |
+---------------------------+-------------------------+
| Signup Rate (/hr) | Payment Success Rate (%) |
| Compare to projection | Target: > 95% |
| Alert: 0 for 30min | Alert: < 90% |
+---------------------------+-------------------------+
| CPU / Memory | Database Connections |
| Alert: > 80% | Alert: > 80% pool |
+---------------------------+-------------------------+# monitoring/launch-dashboard.yml
panels:
- title: Request Rate
query: sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
alert_threshold: 200
- title: Error Rate
query: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status_code=~"5.."}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) * 100
alert_threshold: 2
- title: p95 Latency
query: |
histogram_quantile(0.95,
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le))
alert_threshold: 0.5
- title: Signup Rate
query: sum(increase(user_signups_total[1h]))
alert_threshold: 0 # alert if zero for 30 min
- title: Payment Success Rate
query: |
sum(rate(payment_completed_total[5m]))
/ sum(rate(payment_attempted_total[5m])) * 100
alert_threshold: 90 # alert if belowComplete this before you deploy. If you cannot fill every field, you are not ready to launch.
# Rollback Plan: [Product Name] v[X.Y.Z]
## Decision Criteria
Trigger rollback if ANY of these occur within 60 minutes of deploy:
- [ ] Error rate exceeds 5%
- [ ] p95 latency exceeds 2 seconds for 5 consecutive minutes
- [ ] Payment processing fails for 3+ consecutive attempts
- [ ] Data integrity issue detected (mismatched records)
## Rollback Steps
1. Set feature flag `launch_v1` to OFF (immediate, <30 seconds)
2. Revert DNS/load balancer to previous deployment
3. Run: `kubectl rollout undo deployment/api --to-revision=PREV`
OR: `docker compose -f docker-compose.prod.yml up -d --force-recreate`
4. Verify health check returns 200 on previous version
5. Notify #incidents channel: "Rollback executed, investigating"
## Data Migration Rollback
- [ ] Database migration has a DOWN migration
- [ ] Tested: `npm run migrate:down` or `python manage.py migrate APP PREVIOUS`
- [ ] New columns are NULLABLE (old code ignores them)
- [ ] No destructive changes (column drops, renames) in this release
## Communication
- Engineering: #incidents Slack channel
- Support: Pre-drafted message in support tool
- Customers: Status page update (only if downtime > 5 min)
## Owner
- Rollback decision: [On-call engineer name]
- Execution: [DevOps engineer name]
- Communication: [Support lead name]# Launch Day Incident Playbook
## Severity Levels
| Level | Definition | Response | Example |
|-------|-----------------------------|-----------|----------------------------|
| SEV-1 | Service down, data loss | 5 min | Database unreachable |
| SEV-2 | Major feature broken | 15 min | Payments failing |
| SEV-3 | Minor feature broken | 1 hour | Email delivery delayed |
| SEV-4 | Cosmetic issue | Next day | Alignment bug on Safari |
## On-Call Roster (Launch Day)
| Role | Primary | Secondary | Contact |
|--------------------|----------------|----------------|----------------|
| Incident Commander | [Name] | [Name] | [Phone/Slack] |
| Backend Engineer | [Name] | [Name] | [Phone/Slack] |
| Frontend Engineer | [Name] | [Name] | [Phone/Slack] |
| DevOps/SRE | [Name] | [Name] | [Phone/Slack] |
## Response Flow
1. DETECT - Alert fires or user reports issue
2. TRIAGE - Assign severity, open incident channel (#inc-YYYYMMDD-NN)
3. CONTAIN - Feature flag OFF, rollback, or scale up
4. FIX - Root cause fix, deploy to staging, verify
5. DEPLOY - Push fix to production with monitoring
6. REVIEW - Post-incident review within 48 hours
## Pre-Written Status Page Messages
- Investigating: "We are aware of an issue affecting [X] and are investigating."
- Identified: "The issue has been identified. A fix is being deployed."
- Resolved: "The issue has been resolved. All systems are operational."Monday 9:00 AM:
- Mass email to 50,000 person waitlist
- ProductHunt launch post goes live
- Hacker News submission
- All social media posts scheduled simultaneously
- Full feature set available to everyone
Monday 9:15 AM:
- 3,000 concurrent users hit the app
- Database connections exhausted
- Payment webhook queue backs up
- Support inbox: 200 tickets in 30 minutes
- Error rate: 15%
- Team panics
Monday 10:00 AM:
- Emergency rollback
- Status page: "We are experiencing issues"
- ProductHunt comments: "This doesn't work"
- First impression destroyed// Feature flag configuration for phased rollout
const LAUNCH_PHASES = {
phase1: {
name: 'Team and Friends',
startDate: '2025-01-06',
criteria: { userList: 'internal-testers' }, // 50 users
goal: 'Find critical bugs before anyone else sees them',
},
phase2: {
name: 'Beta Waitlist (10%)',
startDate: '2025-01-08',
criteria: { percentage: 10 }, // 500 users
goal: 'Validate onboarding flow and payment',
},
phase3: {
name: 'Beta Waitlist (50%)',
startDate: '2025-01-10',
criteria: { percentage: 50 }, // 2,500 users
goal: 'Load test with real traffic patterns',
},
phase4: {
name: 'Full Waitlist + Public',
startDate: '2025-01-13',
criteria: { percentage: 100 }, // everyone
goal: 'General availability',
},
} as constWeek 1 Monday: 50 internal users -> Find showstoppers
Week 1 Wednesday: 500 beta users -> Validate payment flow
Week 1 Friday: 2,500 beta users -> Verify infrastructure holds
Week 2 Monday: Full public launch -> Confidence backed by data
Each phase gate:
[x] Error rate < 1%
[x] p95 latency < 300ms
[x] Payment success > 98%
[x] NPS from phase users > 30
[x] Zero data integrity issues
-> Only then proceed to next phase| Dimension | Big Bang | Phased Rollout |
|---|---|---|
| Risk | All-or-nothing | Contained per phase |
| Feedback | Overwhelming, chaotic | Manageable, actionable |
| Infrastructure | Guess and hope | Scale based on real data |
| Recovery | Public failure | Private fix |
| First impression | One shot | Refined over 4 attempts |
| Team stress | Maximum | Distributed |
Key principle: Launch is not a single moment -- it is a process. Every item you skip is a bet that nothing will go wrong in that area. The checklist exists to make the boring stuff automatic so you can focus on users.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.