resume-handoff — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited resume-handoff (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are tasked with resuming work from a handoff document through an interactive process. These handoffs contain critical context, learnings, and next steps from previous work sessions that need to be understood and continued.
When this command is invoked:
thoughts/shared/plans or thoughts/shared/research. do NOT use a sub-agent to read these critical files.thoughts/shared/handoffs/ENG-XXXX where ENG-XXXX is the ticket number. e.g. for ENG-2124 the handoffs would be in thoughts/shared/handoffs/ENG-2124/. List this directory's contents.YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS in 24-hour time format), proceed with the _most recent_ handoff document.thoughts/shared/plans or thoughts/shared/research; do NOT use a sub-agent to read these critical files.I'll help you resume work from a handoff document. Let me find the available handoffs.
Which handoff would you like to resume from?
Tip: You can invoke this command directly with a handoff path: `/resume_handoff `thoughts/shared/handoffs/ENG-XXXX/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS_ENG-XXXX_description.md`
or using a ticket number to resume from the most recent handoff for that ticket: `/resume_handoff ENG-XXXX`Then wait for the user's input.
Based on the handoff content, spawn parallel research tasks to verify current state:
Task 1 - Gather artifact context:
Read all artifacts mentioned in the handoff.
1. Read feature documents listed in "Artifacts"
2. Read implementation plans referenced
3. Read any research documents mentioned
4. Extract key requirements and decisions
Use tools: Read
Return: Summary of artifact contents and key decisions I've analyzed the handoff from [date] by [researcher]. Here's the current situation:
**Original Tasks:**
- [Task 1]: [Status from handoff] → [Current verification]
- [Task 2]: [Status from handoff] → [Current verification]
**Key Learnings Validated:**
- [Learning with file:line reference] - [Still valid/Changed]
- [Pattern discovered] - [Still applicable/Modified]
**Recent Changes Status:**
- [Change 1] - [Verified present/Missing/Modified]
- [Change 2] - [Verified present/Missing/Modified]
**Artifacts Reviewed:**
- [Document 1]: [Key takeaway]
- [Document 2]: [Key takeaway]
**Recommended Next Actions:**
Based on the handoff's action items and current state:
1. [Most logical next step based on handoff]
2. [Second priority action]
3. [Additional tasks discovered]
**Potential Issues Identified:**
- [Any conflicts or regressions found]
- [Missing dependencies or broken code]
Shall I proceed with [recommended action 1], or would you like to adjust the approach? I've created a task list based on the handoff and current analysis:
[Show todo list]
Ready to begin with the first task: [task description]?CRITICAL: Do NOT implement directly. Always spawn via Task tool.
Leads (can spawn workers):
| Agent | Domain | Use For |
|---|---|---|
kraken | implement | Large features, new systems, major components |
architect | plan | Feature design, system architecture, implementation planning |
phoenix | plan | Refactoring plans, migrations, codebase restructuring |
herald | deploy | Releases, deployments, publishing |
maestro | orchestrate | Complex multi-agent workflows |
Workers (focused specialists):
| Agent | Domain | Use For |
|---|---|---|
spark | implement | Quick fixes, patches, minor tweaks |
scribe | document | Documentation, guides, explanations |
sleuth | debug | Bug investigation, tracing, root cause analysis |
aegis | debug | Security audits, vulnerability scanning |
profiler | debug | Performance optimization, bottleneck analysis |
arbiter | validate | Unit tests |
atlas | validate | E2E/integration tests |
oracle | research | External docs, best practices, how-to |
scout | research | Codebase exploration, finding existing code |
pathfinder | research | Repository structure analysis |
plan-reviewer | review | Feature plan review, design validation |
plan-reviewer | review | Migration review, refactoring validation |
chronicler | session | Session analysis, history summaries |
Use Task tool with:
- subagent_type: [selected agent from above]
- prompt: [task description + relevant handoff context + learnings]User: /resume_handoff specification/feature/handoffs/handoff-0.md
Assistant: Let me read and analyze that handoff document...
[Reads handoff completely]
[Spawns research tasks]
[Waits for completion]
[Reads identified files]
I've analyzed the handoff from [date]. Here's the current situation...
[Presents analysis]
Shall I proceed with implementing the webhook validation fix, or would you like to adjust the approach?
User: Yes, proceed with the webhook validation
Assistant: This is a bugfix task, so I'll route to the `spark` agent.
[Uses Task tool with subagent_type="spark" and prompt containing:
- The webhook validation fix task
- Key learnings from handoff
- Relevant file:line references
- Patterns to follow]
[Waits for spark agent to complete]
The spark agent has completed the webhook validation fix. Moving to the next task...~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.