pentest-methodology — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited pentest-methodology (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Etik guvenlik testi metodolojisi. Shannon framework'unden adapte.
ONEMLI: Bu skill sadece YETKILI guvenlik testleri icin kullanilir. Bug bounty, pentest anlasmasi, veya kendi sisteminiz olmali.
Phase 1: Recon ──▶ Phase 2: Vuln Analysis ──▶ Phase 3: Exploitation
│
Phase 5: Report ◀── Phase 4: Verification ◀────────────┘| Adim | Arac/Yontem | Cikti |
|---|---|---|
| Subdomain enum | DNS brute, certificate transparency | Subdomain listesi |
| Port scan | nmap, masscan | Acik portlar |
| Tech stack | Wappalyzer, HTTP headers | Teknoloji listesi |
| Directory enum | ffuf, gobuster | Endpoint listesi |
| API discovery | Swagger/OpenAPI, sitemap | API endpoint'leri |
| Source review | JS dosyalari, comments | Hardcoded info |
OWASP Top 10 kontrol matrisi:
| # | Vuln | Test Yontemi |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | IDOR, privilege escalation, path traversal |
| A02 | Cryptographic Failures | SSL config, weak ciphers, plaintext storage |
| A03 | Injection | SQLi, XSS, command injection, template injection |
| A04 | Insecure Design | Business logic flaws, race conditions |
| A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Default creds, verbose errors, CORS |
| A06 | Vulnerable Components | CVE scan, outdated dependencies |
| A07 | Auth Failures | Brute force, session fixation, JWT attacks |
| A08 | Data Integrity | Deserialization, CI/CD pipeline attacks |
| A09 | Logging Failures | Log injection, insufficient audit trail |
| A10 | SSRF | Internal service access, cloud metadata |
Her bulgu icin:
Bulgunun gercek oldugunu dogrula:
Yapilandirilmis bulgu formati (asagida)
| Level | Tanim | Ornek |
|---|---|---|
| L1 - Theoretical | Potansiyel risk, exploit edilmemis | "Bu endpoint input validate etmiyor" |
| L2 - Demonstrated | Bypass/leak gosterildi | "SQL injection ile hata mesaji leak etti" |
| L3 - Exploited | Tam exploit, veri erisimi | "Admin panel'e yetkisiz erisim saglandi" |
| L4 - Chained | Birden fazla vuln zincirlendi | "XSS + CSRF = Account takeover" |
## [SEVERITY] Finding Title
**ID**: FINDING-001
**Severity**: Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational
**Proof Level**: L1 / L2 / L3 / L4
**CVSS**: X.X (hesapla: cvss.org)
**CWE**: CWE-XXX
### Description
Ne bulundu, tek paragraf.
### Impact
Exploit edilirse ne olur?
### Steps to Reproduce
1. [Adim 1]
2. [Adim 2]
3. [Adim 3]
### Proof
[Screenshot, HTTP request/response, veya kod]
### Remediation
Nasil duzeltilir?
### References
- [OWASP link]
- [CWE link]Kullanici input'unun tehlikeli bir fonksiyona ulasip ulasamadigini kontrol et:
Source (Input) ──▶ Transform/Sanitize? ──▶ Sink (Tehlikeli fonksiyon)
req.body.username ──▶ Validation var mi? ──▶ db.query(...)
req.query.redirect ──▶ URL whitelist var mi? ──▶ res.redirect(...)
req.headers.host ──▶ Sanitize var mi? ──▶ fetch(...)Source'lar: req.body, req.query, req.params, req.headers, cookies, file uploads Sink'ler: SQL query, eval(), exec(), redirect(), innerHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.