harvest-competitive — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited harvest-competitive (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Automated competitive intelligence gathering. Extract and compare features, pricing, technology stacks, and market positioning from competitor websites.
# Analyze a single competitor
/harvest-competitive https://competitor.com
# Compare multiple competitors
/harvest-competitive https://a.com https://b.com https://c.com --compare
# Focus on specific aspect
/harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus pricing
/harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus features
/harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus tech-stack# Competitive Analysis: [Company]
> Source: [URLs]
> Date: [timestamp]
## Product Overview
[What they do, target market, positioning]
## Features
| Feature | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| Feature A | Yes | [details] |
| Feature B | No | - |
## Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Limits |
|------|-------|-----------|
| Free | $0 | [limits] |
| Pro | $X/mo | [limits] |
## Technology Stack (detected)
- Frontend: [framework]
- Backend: [inferred from headers/scripts]
- CDN: [provider]
- Analytics: [tools]
## Strengths & Weaknesses
### Strengths
- [strength 1]
### Weaknesses
- [weakness 1]
## Comparison Matrix (multi-competitor)
| Aspect | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|--------|-----|-------------|-------------|
| Feature X | Yes | Yes | No |
| Price | $X | $Y | $Z |~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.