web-section-breaker — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited web-section-breaker (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Splits a long article or draft into web-optimised sections by inserting clear subheadings and natural break points — without rewriting the text — so readers can scan, navigate, and stay engaged on screen.
Required: The full article text, pasted in without existing subheadings (or with them, if you want them reviewed and improved). Optional: Target word count per section (default: 200–350 words); tone of subheadings (neutral/informational vs. punchy/curiosity-driven); whether you want a table of contents at the top; whether subheadings should be keyword-rich for SEO; the publication's house style for heading capitalisation (title case vs. sentence case).
Full article with H2-level subheadings inserted at each break point. Body text is unchanged word-for-word. Subheadings appear on their own line, preceded and followed by a blank line. If a table of contents is requested, it appears before the first paragraph as a numbered or bulleted list. A brief editor's note at the end states how many sections were created and flags any structural issues found in the source text.
Article text (excerpt — 3 sections):
The northern fishing communities of the Valdris Coast have spent the past decade watching their catch quotas shrink. In 2015, regional authorities cut the annual cod allowance by 40 percent, citing stock depletion data from a single survey conducted during an unusually cold winter. Fishers say the methodology was flawed from the start.
"They counted in February," says one boat owner who has worked the coast for thirty years. "Cod don't feed near the surface in February. Of course the numbers looked bad." His view is shared by most of the forty-odd vessels still operating out of the port.
The quota reduction triggered an economic chain reaction that planners did not anticipate. Processing plants that once employed 200 workers year-round cut to skeleton crews. Two of the three fish-and-chip restaurants on the harbourfront closed within eighteen months. The local school lost twelve pupils as families relocated inland for work.
A legal challenge mounted by the Valdris Fishers' Collective reached the regional tribunal in 2019. The collective argued that the 2015 survey was conducted outside the species' normal feeding season and that the quota had been set without consulting independent marine biologists. The tribunal agreed on the procedural point but declined to overturn the quota, ruling that authorities had the discretion to set limits conservatively.
Since the ruling, two things have happened. The fish stocks — by all available measures — have partially recovered. And the communities have not. A 2023 survey by the regional development agency found that household income in the four affected municipalities had fallen 22 percent in real terms since 2015. Youth unemployment stands at 34 percent, the highest in the region.
Style: sentence case subheadings. No table of contents needed.## A quota built on contested data
The northern fishing communities of the Valdris Coast have spent the past decade watching their catch quotas shrink. In 2015, regional authorities cut the annual cod allowance by 40 percent, citing stock depletion data from a single survey conducted during an unusually cold winter. Fishers say the methodology was flawed from the start.
"They counted in February," says one boat owner who has worked the coast for thirty years. "Cod don't feed near the surface in February. Of course the numbers looked bad." His view is shared by most of the forty-odd vessels still operating out of the port.
## The economic chain reaction planners missed
The quota reduction triggered an economic chain reaction that planners did not anticipate. Processing plants that once employed 200 workers year-round cut to skeleton crews. Two of the three fish-and-chip restaurants on the harbourfront closed within eighteen months. The local school lost twelve pupils as families relocated inland for work.
## A legal challenge that changed nothing
A legal challenge mounted by the Valdris Fishers' Collective reached the regional tribunal in 2019. The collective argued that the 2015 survey was conducted outside the species' normal feeding season and that the quota had been set without consulting independent marine biologists. The tribunal agreed on the procedural point but declined to overturn the quota, ruling that authorities had the discretion to set limits conservatively.
## Fish stocks recover; communities do not
Since the ruling, two things have happened. The fish stocks — by all available measures — have partially recovered. And the communities have not. A 2023 survey by the regional development agency found that household income in the four affected municipalities had fallen 22 percent in real terms since 2015. Youth unemployment stands at 34 percent, the highest in the region.Editor's note: 4 sections created. Average section length: 105 words (this is a short excerpt; full articles will produce sections closer to the 200–350 word target). No structural issues found — break points were clear.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.