re-engagement-email-writer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited re-engagement-email-writer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Writes a targeted re-engagement email (or short sequence of two emails) for subscribers who have stopped opening the newsletter, designed to recover attention or prompt a clean unsubscribe before list hygiene becomes a deliverability problem.
Required: Newsletter name and a brief description of what it covers; typical inactivity threshold you are targeting (e.g. "no opens in 90 days"); the newsletter's current voice and tone Optional: Any recent improvements or changes to the newsletter worth highlighting to lapsed subscribers; the consequences if they do not re-engage (will you remove them from the list?); a reason to stay (offer, exclusive content, or best recent edition); whether you want a single email or a two-email sequence
Single email: 150–250 words. No subject line psychology tricks — subject lines for re-engagement emails should be plainspoken and slightly self-aware (e.g. "Still there?" or "Honest question"). Two-email sequence: Email 1 at 200–250 words, Email 2 at 100–150 words. Subject line included above each email. Both emails include a clearly labelled CTA: either a "Keep me subscribed" confirmation link placeholder or a direct link to a specific piece of content.
Newsletter: The Friction Report Description: Data-driven newsletter for product managers and UX professionals. Analysis of UX research, product decisions, and design failures. Inactive threshold: No opens in 90 days Voice: Sharp, a little sardonic, evidence-based Recent standout edition: An analysis of why adding a progress bar to subscription box checkouts increased abandonment by 14% — contradicted 10 years of conventional UX advice Sequence: Two emails Consequence of no response: Will be removed from list after Email 2
Email 1
Subject: You haven't opened this in 90 days
That's not an accusation. It's just a fact, and you probably have a reason.
The Friction Report goes out weekly with one thing: analysis of UX research that challenges what the industry thinks it knows. No opinion columns, no trend summaries — just the data and what it actually means.
In case you've been away: the most-read edition this year looked at why progress bars increase abandonment in subscription checkout flows. Fourteen percent. It ran counter to a decade of advice and a lot of people have been quietly redesigning things since.
If that sounds like something you'd read, you're still on the right list.
[Keep me subscribed →]
If not, no issue — the unsubscribe link is below and it works instantly.
— The Friction Report
Email 2 (send 6 days after Email 1 if no open/click)
Subject: Last one, then I'll leave you alone
This is the last email I'll send before removing you from the list.
If you want to stay subscribed, click below — no forms, no questions.
[Keep me subscribed →]
If you'd rather go, the unsubscribe link below does it immediately. Either way, thanks for being here as long as you were.
— The Friction Report
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.