data-table-formatter — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited data-table-formatter (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Formats raw or messy data into a clean, publication-ready table with appropriate headers, sorted rows, consistent number formatting, and a source note — ready to drop into an article, report, or web page.
Required: The raw data (pasted as text, CSV, or a description of the rows and columns). The intended purpose (news article, annual report, magazine feature, etc.). The data source for the footnote. Optional: Whether the table should be sorted and by which column; any columns to exclude from the published version; preferred number format (e.g. round to nearest whole number, use commas for thousands); a specific headline or title for the table.
A Markdown table with a bold title above it and a source note in italics below. Column headers are capitalised consistently. Numbers use the specified format (or a sensible default: two decimal places for percentages, whole numbers for large counts, commas for thousands). Rows sorted by the most newsworthy column unless otherwise specified. One to two formatting notes below the source line if any decisions required editorial judgement (e.g. "Figures rounded to the nearest whole number").
Raw data (pasted from spreadsheet export):
AUTHORITY_NM,REG,WAIT_MED,WAIT_90PCT,TOT_WAITING,BREACH_18WK,YOY_CHG
North Coastal,North,68,142,12400,3100,22
Central Metro,Central,31,74,18900,1800,-4
Eastern Plains,East,55,118,6200,1400,9
Westbridge,West,44,97,9300,2200,6
Southern Coastal,South,37,83,14600,2900,-1
Midlands North,Central,49,111,7800,1600,12Purpose: News article table, orthopaedics waiting times Source: National Health Statistics Agency, Q3 2026 Sort by: Median wait (highest first) Title suggestion: How long are patients waiting for orthopaedic treatment?
How long are patients waiting for orthopaedic treatment?
| Health Authority | Region | Median wait (days) | 90th-percentile wait (days) | Total waiting | Breaching 18-week target | Year-on-year change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Coastal | North | 68 | 142 | 12,400 | 3,100 | +22% |
| Eastern Plains | East | 55 | 118 | 6,200 | 1,400 | +9% |
| Midlands North | Central | 49 | 111 | 7,800 | 1,600 | +12% |
| Westbridge | West | 44 | 97 | 9,300 | 2,200 | +6% |
| Southern Coastal | South | 37 | 83 | 14,600 | 2,900 | -1% |
| Central Metro | Central | 31 | 74 | 18,900 | 1,800 | -4% |
Source: National Health Statistics Agency, Q3 2026.
Formatting notes: Year-on-year change expressed as percentage. Rows sorted by median wait time, highest to lowest. All figures as published; no rounding applied.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.