crisis-statement-writer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited crisis-statement-writer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Drafts an initial crisis communications statement for an organisation responding to a breaking negative story, balancing acknowledgement, accountability, and composure under the three-part structure used by professional crisis communicators: Empathy, Action, Information.
Required: A plain-language description of what happened; what is confirmed vs what is still under investigation; the organisation's name and what it does; whether any people were harmed (yes/no/unknown); what action has been taken so far.
Optional: A specific spokesperson name and title; whether legal has cleared any admissions; the target audience (general public, employees, investors, regulators — each requires a different register); any previous public statements that must remain consistent; the channel this will be published on (website, social media, issued to wire).
150–300 words. Single unbroken statement (no headers, no bullet points). First person plural ("We") for the organisation. Present and recent-past tense. Tone: serious, composed, direct — not apologetic to the point of legal exposure, not defensive to the point of public anger. No jargon. One paragraph for each of: acknowledgement, what is confirmed, action taken. Issued-to line and date at top if requested.
What happened: A gas leak at a food processing plant operated by Carlyle Food Group caused the evacuation of 340 workers at 6:45 a.m. this morning. Six workers were treated on site by paramedics for minor respiratory symptoms. All six have been assessed and none required hospital admission. The cause of the leak is not yet confirmed — preliminary assessment points to a faulty valve in the cold storage unit.
Organisation: Carlyle Food Group — mid-size food manufacturer with three UK plants.
Action taken: Plant evacuated, sealed, emergency services called, internal investigation launched.
Spokesperson: Head of Communications (name not for attribution).
Target: General media, issued to wire. Morning news cycle.
Statement from Carlyle Food Group 16 March 2026
This morning, a gas leak at our Carlyle Food Group processing facility in [location] required the evacuation of approximately 340 workers at 6:45 a.m. We are grateful that emergency services responded promptly and that all six workers who reported respiratory symptoms have been assessed and discharged without hospital admission. We are relieved no one required further medical treatment.
The cause of the leak has not yet been determined. Preliminary assessment by our engineering team indicates a potential fault in cold storage equipment, but we will not speculate further until a full investigation is complete. The facility remains sealed pending that investigation.
We have notified the relevant regulatory authorities and will cooperate fully with any official inquiry. We will provide a further update by 6:00 p.m. today or sooner if circumstances warrant. Anyone with concerns — including employees and their families — may contact our dedicated information line at [number].
We are focused entirely on the safety of our people and the integrity of this investigation.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.