caption-writer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited caption-writer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Writes platform-optimised social media captions for Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, or Twitter/X from a brief, article excerpt, or content description — matched to the platform's conventions and the account's voice.
Required: The platform(s) you are writing for (Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, Twitter/X), what the post is about or what it shows/links to, the intended effect (inform, provoke discussion, drive to a link, build community, entertain).
Optional: Your account's voice or tone (formal, conversational, opinionated, dry, warm), any hashtag strategy or specific tags to include, the account type (personal brand, media outlet, documentary film, magazine, podcast), a character or word count limit.
One caption per platform requested. Instagram: 125–200 words + hashtag suggestions (5–10 relevant tags). LinkedIn: 100–150 words, no hashtag padding. TikTok: 50–80 words, conversational, fast. Twitter/X: 240–280 characters, with an optional threaded follow-up. Each caption clearly labelled with the platform. Emojis used if appropriate to the voice and platform; omitted if the account is formal or serious. Output ends with a "Next Step" note: which caption to post first, whether to run thread-writer or carousel-script-writer to extend the content, and the recommended post scheduling action.
Platform: Instagram and LinkedIn Content: A new episode of an investigative documentary podcast just dropped. Episode 6 digs into how a legal provision designed to protect whistleblowers has been used repeatedly by corporations to suppress journalists. Three lawyers and two former journalists who had their stories killed are interviewed. Account type: Documentary podcast Voice: Serious, direct, a little dry Intended effect: Drive listens, provoke discussion
The law that's supposed to protect whistleblowers.
Episode 6 of [PODCAST NAME] looks at how a legal provision designed to shield people who speak out has quietly become one of the most effective tools corporations use to kill journalism instead.
Three lawyers. Two journalists whose stories never ran. And the documents that explain why.
Link in bio.
#investigativejournalism #documentarypodcast #pressfreedoom #whistleblowers #mediaindustry #journalism #podcast #truecrime #medialaw
Episode 6 of [PODCAST NAME] examines something that doesn't get enough attention: how whistleblower protection statutes — designed to encourage transparency — have been turned into litigation instruments that silence investigative reporting.
We interviewed three legal practitioners and two journalists whose stories were suppressed using these mechanisms. What they describe is a pattern, not a series of isolated incidents.
For anyone working in media law, investigative journalism, or press freedom — this episode is worth your time.
Listen at [link].
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.