creating-replay-vision-scanners — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited creating-replay-vision-scanners (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A scanner is a standing LLM probe over session recordings. Once created and enabled, it runs on a Temporal schedule that sweeps every 5 minutes, applying its prompt to each new matching recording and recording the result as an observation (a queryable $recording_observed event). Each observation counts against a monthly org quota (a fixed number of observations per calendar month).
That schedule is exactly why creation needs a gut-check: a scanner with a permissive query and full sampling starts consuming quota automatically and can drain the whole month's budget within its first few sweeps. Creation itself does not check quota — that protection only kicks in at observation time, by which point the budget may already be gone.
Never create an enabled scanner blind. Estimate its volume, check remaining quota, and — when the projected volume is a meaningful fraction of what's left — show the user the numbers and get confirmation before creating. This is the heart of the skill; the rest is supporting detail.
Pick a scanner_type and write its scanner_config. Every type needs a prompt; the rest is type-specific:
| Type | What it produces | scanner_config shape | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
monitor | Open-ended observation against a prompt (e.g. "flag rage clicks") | {"prompt": "..."} | ||
classifier | Assigns tags from a fixed label set | {"prompt": "...", "tags": ["tag-a", "tag-b"]} — tags needs ≥1 entry; optional "multi_label": true, "allow_freeform_tags": false | ||
scorer | Numeric score on a rubric | {"prompt": "...", "scale": {"min": 1, "max": 5, "label": "frustration"}} — min < max; label optional | ||
summarizer | Free-text summary; optional facet embeddings for search | {"prompt": "..."}; optional `"length": "short" \ | "medium" \ | "long" (default "medium"), "emits_embeddings": false` |
scanner_type is locked after creation — to change it you delete and recreate, so confirm the type is right up front, and get the scanner_config shape right (a wrong shape is a create error, not a silent default).
If the user's intent makes the type and prompt obvious, just proceed — don't interrogate them.
The query is a RecordingsQuery shape that selects which recordings the scanner watches. date_from and date_to are ignored (the schedule controls time), so don't bother setting them. Narrow the query to the sessions that actually matter — by event, URL, person property, duration, etc. A narrow query is the single biggest lever on cost.
sampling_rate (0..1, default 1.0) is a random downsample applied _after_ the query matches. Lower it to trade coverage for budget.
Before creating, run both checks and reason about them together:
vision-scanners-estimate-create with the proposed query + sampling_rate.It returns matched_sessions_in_window, the window_days measured, and estimated_observations_per_month.
vision-quota-retrieve for remaining and exhausted against the org's monthlymonthly_quota.
Then decide:
estimated_observations_per_month comfortably fits within remaining, proceed.remaining, stop and tell the user the concrete numbers— e.g. "This scanner is projected to produce ~X observations/month; you have Y of Z left this month." — and confirm before creating, or suggest tightening the query or lowering sampling_rate first.
exhausted, say so — a new enabled scanner won't produce anything until the quotaresets, and its observations will be silently skipped.
Confirmation here is a conversation step, not an API capability — surface the trade-off and let the user choose. When the projected volume is clearly small relative to the budget, you don't need to ask.
Call vision-scanners-create. Minimal example:
{
"name": "Rage click monitor",
"scanner_type": "monitor",
"scanner_config": { "prompt": "Flag sessions where the user repeatedly clicks the same element in frustration." },
"query": { "kind": "RecordingsQuery", "events": [{ "id": "$rageclick", "type": "events" }] },
"sampling_rate": 1.0,
"model": "gemini-3-flash-preview",
"enabled": true
}name must be unique within the team. Set enabled: false if the user wants to create it paused (no schedule, no quota consumption) and turn it on later.
them with vision-scanners-observations-list for one scanner over time, or vision-observations-list (requires session_id) for every scanner's findings on a single session. To dig into a recording, hand off to the investigating-replay skill.
vision-scanners-update is a partial update — send only changed fields. Re-run the Step 3 gut-check whenever you widen scope: a broader query or a higher sampling_rate raises the sweep volume just like a fresh broad scanner would. Toggling enabled, tweaking the prompt, or narrowing the query don't need a re-estimate. Editing config bumps scanner_version; past observations keep a snapshot of the old config.
failed or ineligible one — is a no-op and won't produce a fresh scan.
ineligible (e.g. too_short, no_recording) — a terminalnon-error outcome. Check error_reason when triaging why a scanner produced nothing.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.