backend-test — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited backend-test (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Local stack only. Everything runs against the repo's local dev environment (docker compose / local services + local PostgreSQL). Never point a test at staging or production data — reading staging logs is control-deployment's territory. Bring the stack up per references/stacks.md (read it for compose commands, ports, migration commands per repo) — reuse a running stack, start what's missing, kill only what you started.
For each endpoint the diff touched:
"data".alembic upgrade head or the repo's equivalent). An autogenerated migration that diverges from the models is a finding.Same discipline as verify: full failure output, root cause in the named files, smallest fix, re-run the failing probe only, 3 attempts per issue then FAILED + diagnosis. Never fix a 500 by widening the accepted input; fix the handler. Forbidden suppressions apply.
BACKEND-TEST — <PASS | FAIL>
Stack: <reused | started+killed: what>
<METHOD /path>: happy <ok> | edges <n ok, n fixed, n FAILED> | logs <clean | findings>
Migrations: <ok | FAILED> | Rows: <ok> | Constraints: <n enforced, n FAILED>~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.