consensus-governance — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited consensus-governance (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Witan provides multi-agent consensus, policy enforcement, and governance. Use for decisions requiring collective agreement or human escalation.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
witan_propose | Submit action for consensus |
witan_vote | Cast vote on proposal |
witan_check_status | Check proposal status |
witan_enforce_policy | Check if action is allowed |
witan_create_policy | Create governance policy |
witan_broadcast | Message all agents |
witan_escalate | Escalate to human review |
witan_propose({
action: "deploy_to_production",
required_approvals: ["security-agent", "qa-agent"],
protocol: "unanimous"
})
→ { proposal_id: "prop_abc123", status: "pending" }witan_vote({
proposal_id: "prop_abc123",
agent_id: "security-agent",
vote: "approve"
})
→ { vote_recorded: true, current_status: "pending" }witan_enforce_policy({
action: "access_financial_data",
actor: "junior-agent"
})
→ { allowed: false, reason: "Requires senior approval" }witan_escalate({
action: "delete_customer_data",
reason: "Requires human approval",
escalate_to: "human-supervisor"
})
→ { escalation_id: "esc_def456", status: "pending_human_review" }| Protocol | Use Case |
|---|---|
unanimous | Critical decisions (deployments, deletions) |
majority | Standard decisions (>50%) |
weighted_majority | Expert-weighted voting |
quorum | Minimum participation required |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.