post-design-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited post-design-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Respond in the user's preferred language (detect from their recent messages, or fall back to the language setting in CLAUDE.md).
Review a game design document from an implementer's perspective.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (path to a design document, or empty to use the most recent design doc in Docs/qq/)
*_design.md in Docs/qq/./qq:plan. If invoked with `--auto` (or called from a skill running in `--auto` mode): run qq-execute-checkpoint.py pipeline-advance --project . --completed-skill "/qq:post-design-review" --next-skill "/qq:plan", then invoke /qq:plan --auto <document-path>.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.