changes — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited changes (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Run qq scripts as${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/<name>: they are not on PATH, so a bareqq-run-record.pyexits 127.
Respond in the user's preferred language (detect from their recent messages, or fall back to the language setting in CLAUDE.md).
Identify all file changes actually executed by Claude in this conversation (via Edit/Write/Bash tools) and summarize them grouped by logic.
The data source is the conversation context, not git diff — include every round, committed or not.
After producing the summary, if qq-run-record.py is available, persist a changes run record so controller state can advance:
qq-run-record.py record \
--project . \
--stage changes \
--command qq:changes \
--status checked \
--summary "Conversation change summary captured" \
--capture-local-changes## Summary of changes in this conversation
### <Group 1 title>
- What was done
- Key files: ...
### <Group 2 title>
- ...
### Status
- Committed: <list of commit hashes, if any>
- Uncommitted: <list of files, if any>
- Compilation: passed / not verified
- Tests: N/N passed / not runAssets/Scripts/ prefix to save space).meta files do not need to be mentioned~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.