idea-validator — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited idea-validator (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
firecrawl_search | Validate market signals, demand indicators |
firecrawl_extract | Pull data from market reports, forums |
Get from the user (or from completed Phase 0 deliverables):
Each dimension scored 1-5. Total score determines recommendation.
#### A. Problem Severity (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | Nice-to-have. Users tolerate current solutions fine. |
| 2 | Mild annoyance. Users complain but don't switch. |
| 3 | Real pain. Users actively search for alternatives. |
| 4 | Hair-on-fire. Users lose money/time daily without a solution. |
| 5 | Mission-critical. Business cannot function without solving this. |
Validate with:
firecrawl_search: "{problem_statement} pain point frustrated"
firecrawl_search: "site:reddit.com {target_user} struggling with {problem}"#### B. Willingness to Pay (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | Users expect free. No existing paid solutions. |
| 2 | Users pay reluctantly. < $10/mo willingness. |
| 3 | Established paid market. $10-50/mo common. |
| 4 | Users budget for this. $50-200/mo normal. |
| 5 | Enterprise budgets. $200+/mo, multi-seat deals. |
Validate with:
firecrawl_search: "{category} pricing SaaS"
firecrawl_search: "{competitor} pricing plans"#### C. Market Timing (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | Market is saturated or declining. |
| 2 | Market exists but growth is flat. |
| 3 | Growing market with room for new entrants. |
| 4 | Emerging market with strong tailwinds (AI, regulation, etc.). |
| 5 | Category creation opportunity — no one owns this yet. |
#### D. Founder-Market Fit (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | No domain expertise, no network, no unfair advantage. |
| 2 | Some interest but learning from scratch. |
| 3 | Adjacent experience. Understand the user but not the domain deeply. |
| 4 | Direct experience. Have felt this pain personally. |
| 5 | Deep domain expertise + network + distribution advantage. |
#### E. Execution Feasibility (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 1 | Requires team of 10+, $1M+, regulatory approval. |
| 2 | Needs specialized skills the founder lacks. |
| 3 | Achievable solo with AI tools in 3-6 months. |
| 4 | MVP shippable in 30-60 days with existing tools. |
| 5 | Can validate in a weekend with no-code or AI agents. |
# Idea Validation Scorecard: {Idea Name}
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|-----------|-------|----------|
| Problem Severity | X/5 | {one-line justification} |
| Willingness to Pay | X/5 | {one-line justification} |
| Market Timing | X/5 | {one-line justification} |
| Founder-Market Fit | X/5 | {one-line justification} |
| Execution Feasibility | X/5 | {one-line justification} |
| **TOTAL** | **XX/25** | |
## Recommendation
- 20-25: **STRONG GO** — Execute immediately.
- 15-19: **CONDITIONAL GO** — Proceed but validate {weakest dimension} first.
- 10-14: **PAUSE** — Significant risks. Pivot or de-risk before investing.
- 5-9: **NO GO** — Fundamental problems. Explore different ideas.Regardless of score, flag these as deal-breakers:
Save to BRAINIAC/0. Idea/VALIDATION_SCORECARD.md
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.