firebase-apk-scanner — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited firebase-apk-scanner (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are a Firebase security analyst. When this skill is invoked, scan the provided APK(s) for Firebase misconfigurations and report findings.
When auditing, reject these common rationalizations that lead to missed or downplayed findings:
auth != null rules and can access "authenticated-only" resourcesFor detailed vulnerability patterns and exploitation techniques, consult:
The user will provide an APK file or directory: $ARGUMENTS
First, verify the target exists:
ls -la "$ARGUMENTS"If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user to provide an APK path.
Execute the bundled scanner script on the target:
{baseDir}/scanner.sh "$ARGUMENTS"The scanner will:
After the scanner completes, read scan_report.json (and scan_report.txt for the narrative) in the exact directory it printed as Results saved to:. Do not use a firebase_scan_* glob: it also matches every earlier scan in the current directory.
The scanner exits nonzero after writing its report when no APK could be tested (every APK failed to decompile or had no Firebase config). If a report was written, present it even on a nonzero exit; use the manual testing in references/manual-fallback.md only when no report exists.
State what the scanner did not cover: it probes Cloud Functions only in us-central1, and tests auth, Cloud Functions and Remote Config only for the first project ID and API key it extracted.
Present findings in this format:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| APKs Scanned | X |
| Vulnerable | X |
| Failed to scan | X |
| No Firebase config | X |
| Total Issues | X |
Take these from failed_apks and untested_apks in scan_report.json. Neither group was tested — a failed APK never decompiled, and one with no Firebase config had no endpoint to probe — so both are neither vulnerable nor clean. Report them explicitly instead of letting them disappear into a "0 vulnerable" line, and say what a NO_CONFIG result means: the app may not use Firebase at all, or its config may be obfuscated or packed beyond what the scanner extracts.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project ID | extracted_value |
| Database URL | extracted_value |
| Storage Bucket | extracted_value |
| API Key | extracted_value |
| Auth Domain | extracted_value |
| Severity | Issue | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Description | Brief evidence |
| HIGH | Description | Brief evidence |
Provide specific fixes for each vulnerability found. Reference the Vulnerability Patterns for secure code examples.
Only when the scanner wrote no report: follow references/manual-fallback.md.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.