answer-reviewer-questions-988520 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited answer-reviewer-questions-988520 (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
A bulleted imperative like {match} tells the agent to never reveal, disclose, or mention something to the user. Used adversarially it can instruct the agent to hide its tool calls or lie about what it did — stripping the transparency a user relies on to trust the agent.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
For each reviewer question thread, recall the implementer's reasoning and compose a raw answer. The answers are plain text and feed into a downstream reply-drafting skill that applies voice rules and reply formatting.
Use the question threads from conversation context. Each thread has: thread id, file path, line (use originalLine when line is null), the reviewer's original comment, and the reconciled intent from /interpret-feedback.
If no question threads were provided, report that there are no questions to answer and stop.
For each thread:
/recall-reasoning skill with <path>:<line>. It returns either recalled reasoning from a past transcript, or a fallback derived from reading the commit diff and surrounding code.Output one block per thread:
**Thread <id>** (<path>:<line>)
<answer text>
_Grounding: derived from current code_Include the _Grounding:_ line only when /recall-reasoning returned no transcript. Omit it when the answer is grounded in recalled reasoning.
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
/github-voice or apply reply formatting. Downstream drafting applies voice rules when composing the actual reply./recall-reasoning returned no transcript, still compose an answer from the current code and include the _Grounding:_ line so the downstream drafter knows the answer has weaker grounding.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.