coauthor-engine — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited coauthor-engine (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Orchestration Log: When this skill is activated, append a log entry tooutputs/orchestration_log.md: ``### Skill Activation: Co-Author Engine **Timestamp:** [current date/time] **Actor:** AI Agent (coauthor-engine) **Input:** [N] authors, task: [contribution tracking / responsibility assignment / CRediT statement] **Output:** author_contributions.md saved``
Modern academic publishing increasingly requires transparent documentation of who did what. The CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) system standardizes this. For AI-assisted papers, documenting the human-AI division of labor is not optional — it's becoming a requirement at major venues.
## Authors
| # | Name | Affiliation | Role | ORCID | Corresponding |
|---|------|-------------|------|-------|--------------|
| 1 | [Name] | [University/Org] | [Senior/Junior/PI] | [ORCID] | [Yes/No] |
| 2 | [Name] | [University/Org] | [Senior/Junior] | [ORCID] | [No] |
| 3 | AI Agent (Claude) | Anthropic | AI Assistant | N/A | No |For each author (including AI), indicate contribution level:
| # | CRediT Role | Definition | Author 1 | Author 2 | AI Agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conceptualization | Ideas, formulation of research goals | Lead | Supporting | — |
| 2 | Data curation | Managing, annotating, maintaining data | Lead | — | Supporting |
| 3 | Formal analysis | Statistical, mathematical, computational analysis | Supporting | — | Lead |
| 4 | Funding acquisition | Obtaining financial support | — | Lead | — |
| 5 | Investigation | Conducting the research, data collection | Lead | Supporting | Supporting |
| 6 | Methodology | Development or design of methodology | Lead | Supporting | Supporting |
| 7 | Project administration | Managing and coordinating the project | Lead | — | — |
| 8 | Resources | Provision of study materials, tools, computing | — | Lead | — |
| 9 | Software | Programming, implementation, code | — | — | Lead |
| 10 | Supervision | Oversight and leadership responsibility | — | Lead | — |
| 11 | Validation | Verification and replication of results | Lead | Supporting | Supporting |
| 12 | Visualization | Creating figures, diagrams, plots | Supporting | — | Lead |
| 13 | Writing — original draft | Creating the initial manuscript | Supporting | — | Lead |
| 14 | Writing — review & editing | Critical review, commentary, revision | Lead | Lead | Supporting |
Levels: Lead / Supporting / — (not involved)
For the AI agent, document specifically:
## AI Contribution Statement
This paper was produced with the assistance of an AI writing system (Claude,
via the Open Academic Paper Machine). The AI system contributed to:
- **Literature search and synthesis:** Automated multi-database search, deduplication,
and initial thematic clustering of [N] papers
- **First draft generation:** Initial drafts of all sections following academic
writing templates, subsequently revised by human authors
- **Figure generation:** [N] figures generated via AI (PaperBanana)
- **Citation verification:** Automated verification of [N] citations against source abstracts
- **LaTeX compilation:** Automated conversion and PDF generation
**Human oversight and quality control:**
- All research questions, theoretical framing, and methodological decisions were
made by human authors
- All AI-generated text was reviewed, revised, and approved by human authors
- Empirical data collection and analysis were conducted by human authors
- Final manuscript was reviewed and approved by all human co-authors
**AI disclosure:** [Statement per venue requirements, e.g., "In accordance with
[Venue]'s AI policy, we disclose that AI tools were used in the preparation of
this manuscript as described above. All authors take full responsibility for the
content."]For ongoing collaboration, track who is responsible for what:
## Task Assignment
| Task | Responsible | Deadline | Status |
|------|------------|----------|--------|
| Finalize RQs | Author 1 | [date] | Done |
| Data collection | Author 1 | [date] | In progress |
| Method section review | Author 2 | [date] | Pending |
| Figure 3 redesign | AI Agent | [date] | Done |
| Discussion revision | Author 1 + Author 2 | [date] | Pending |
| Final proofread | Author 2 | [date] | Pending |
| Cover letter | Author 1 | [date] | Pending |
| Submission | Author 1 (corresponding) | [date] | Pending |Generate venue-appropriate contribution statement:
CRediT format (most journals):
Author Contributions: [Author 1]: Conceptualization (lead), Investigation (lead),
Methodology (lead), Project administration (lead), Validation (lead), Writing —
review & editing (lead). [Author 2]: Conceptualization (supporting), Funding
acquisition (lead), Resources (lead), Supervision (lead), Writing — review &
editing (lead).Prose format (some journals):
[Author 1] conceived the study, conducted the literature review, designed the
methodology, and wrote the initial manuscript. [Author 2] supervised the project,
provided critical feedback on theoretical framing, and co-edited the final
manuscript. Both authors approved the final version.| File | Content |
|---|---|
author_contributions.md | Full CRediT matrix + AI statement + task tracker |
Add to paper.tex | CRediT statement in Author Contributions section |
Add to submission/ | AI disclosure statement for venue requirements |
| Scenario | Integration |
|---|---|
| Submission-engine | Provides author contribution statement for submission |
| Orchestration log | Complements the AI audit trail |
| Review-engine | Tracks who addresses which reviewer comment |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.