translate-incoming-7d159d — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited translate-incoming-7d159d (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Wrapper for translate_incoming on the local mcp-translation server. Takes a verbatim incoming message and returns a structured decode useful for autistic / audhd readers who want the implicit corporate-speak made explicit.
Authoritative schema: packages/mcp-translation/schemas/translate_incoming.schema.json. Design rationale: docs/decisions/0005-translation-tool-design.md — ambiguity spans MUST anchor verbatim to the input.
"what does this actually mean" or "decode this".
asked.
Calls mcp__neurodock-translation__translate_incoming. The server itself performs no LLM calls — it orchestrates a prompt template against the caller's MCP-client LLM (local Ollama or cloud, per the user's profile) and returns the typed response.
The response contains:
explicit_ask — the surface-level request, paraphrased plainly. Nullif the message is a status update with no ask.
likely_subtext[] — up to 5 ranked hypotheses about implicit meaning,each with a 0..1 confidence score.
ambiguity — a report of spans whose meaning is unclear, with{start_char, end_char, reason, note}. The quoted span MUST equal `text[start_char:end_char]` exactly. This is the verbatim-anchor invariant from ADR 0005.
recommended_next_action — a single coarse action + a shortjustification.
model_provenance — which model ran the call (local vs cloud, model id).Input shape:
{
"text": "Hey — can we revisit the rollout timeline? I'm not sure everyone is aligned.",
"channel": "slack",
"thread_context": [
"We agreed last sprint to ship the rollout by end of May.",
"Two engineers flagged risk on the migration script."
]
}Field rules:
text (required): 1–8000 chars. Stored only in-memory; never logged.channel (optional): one of the v0.1.0 enum(slack, email, teams, linear, github, generic). Influences register expectations. Use generic if unsure.
thread_context (optional): up to 20 prior messages, oldest first.Each entry is a verbatim quote, 1–2000 chars.
target_language (optional): BCP-47 tag (e.g. en-IE, de, ja).Falls back to English prompts if no language pack is registered.
Every ambiguity span the caller receives satisfies:
input.text[span.start_char : span.end_char] == (the substring shown in note context)The server's VERBATIM_ANCHOR_FAILED error guarantees this — the LLM cannot fabricate a span. If the response is invalid, the server rejects and the caller retries; it does not "fix up" mismatches.
When rendering ambiguity to a user, always quote the verbatim substring, not a paraphrase. The whole point of the schema's anchor is that the user can trust the quote.
TEXT_REQUIRED — empty text.TEXT_TOO_LONG — over 8000 chars. Split or excerpt.CHANNEL_UNKNOWN — channel not in the v0.1.0 enum. Use generic.LANGUAGE_PACK_MISSING — target_language has no pack. Retry withoutit to fall back to English.
MODEL_UNAVAILABLE — caller's MCP client could not reach its LLM.Server does not retry; caller decides to surface or queue.
VERBATIM_ANCHOR_FAILED — LLM fabricated a span. Retry the call.Local 7B Ollama is more likely to hallucinate than a frontier cloud model, and the verbatim-anchor enforcement will reject those responses. Acceptable failure mode — see ADR 0005 trade-offs section.
to a decode later, the caller must persist it.
packages/evals/corpora/translation/incoming/v0.1.0/general.jsonl — prompt changes ship through the eval pipeline.
When surfacing subtext to the user, lead with the top-confidence hypothesis and label it as a hypothesis ("most likely they mean X"), not as a fact. Quote ambiguous spans verbatim. Do not perform the recommended next action without confirmation — the user reads the brief; the user decides.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.