superblog — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited superblog (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
posts/{YYYY-mm-dd}-{post-title}/The goal here is to help the writer move from a vague idea to a focused concept worth writing about. Good brainstorming uncovers the angle — the specific take that makes a post worth reading rather than just another article on the topic.
Outcome: A clear post concept with a working title, defined audience, chosen tone, and any constraints or must-haves noted.
Now turn the brainstorm into a full, publish-ready post. The writer should be able to copy-paste this into their CMS with minimal edits.
title, date, author, tags, and description (a 1–2 sentence summary for SEO/previews).Checklist: Post has a compelling title, clear structure, concrete examples, YAML frontmatter, and the writer has approved the draft.
Social copy isn't just a shorter version of the post — each platform has its own culture and format. The goal is to make the writer look native on each platform, not like they pasted the same blurb everywhere.
Checklist: LinkedIn post with hook above the fold, X single-tweet and thread versions, all within platform character limits, links included, writer has reviewed.
pwd so they know where files will land).{blog-name}/posts/{YYYY-mm-dd}-{post-title}/blog-name: the blog's name, kebab-cased (e.g., my-tech-blog)YYYY-mm-dd: today's datepost-title: the post title, kebab-cased (e.g., why-onboarding-is-broken)my-tech-blog/posts/2026-04-01-why-onboarding-is-broken/post.md — the full blog post with YAML frontmatterpost.html — an HTML version of the blog post (see reference template below). Convert the Markdown body to semantic HTML. Include a minimal inline stylesheet for readable typography (max-width, line-height, system font stack). Carry over the frontmatter fields into <meta> tags and a <title> element. The HTML file should be self-contained and look good when opened directly in a browser.social.md — the social media copy, organized by platform: # Social Media Copy
## LinkedIn
{linkedin post}
## X (Twitter)
### Single Tweet
{single tweet}
### Thread
{thread}-v2) if they want to keep both versions.post.md, post.html, and social.md.Checklist: Directory created in the correct location,post.md,post.html, andsocial.mdwritten, publishing suggestions shared, no accidental overwrites, writer has the file paths and knows what to do next.
---
title: "Why Developer Onboarding Is Broken"
date: 2026-04-01
author: Your Name
tags: [onboarding, engineering-culture, developer-experience]
description: Most onboarding programs dump information on new hires instead of building context. Here's a better approach.
---
# Why Developer Onboarding Is Broken
Your opening hook goes here — a story, a bold claim, or a question that makes the reader want to keep going.
## The Problem
...
## A Better Approach
...
## What I'd Do Differently
...
## Wrapping Up
A closing thought and call to action.# Social Media Copy
## LinkedIn
Most developer onboarding is just a checklist of tools to install and docs to read.
But the real onboarding — understanding *why* things are built a certain way — takes months of osmosis.
What if we designed for that from day one?
Here's what I learned after watching 20+ engineers struggle through their first sprint:
1. Context beats documentation
2. Pair programming > Confluence pages
3. The first PR should ship on day one
Full post: [link]
#DeveloperExperience #Onboarding #EngineeringCulture
## X (Twitter)
### Single Tweet
Most onboarding is broken because it teaches tools, not context. What if new engineers shipped their first PR on day one? [link]
### Thread
1/ Most developer onboarding is broken.
Not because companies don't try — but because they optimize for information transfer instead of context building.
2/ The typical onboarding:
- Install these 14 tools
- Read these 8 docs
- Shadow someone for a week
- Good luck
The problem? None of this builds understanding of *why* things work the way they do.
3/ What works better:
- Ship a real (small) PR on day one
- Pair with someone who explains the *why*, not just the *how*
- Replace docs with guided exploration
4/ Full post with the details and what I'd do differently: [link]<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Why Developer Onboarding Is Broken</title>
<meta name="author" content="Your Name">
<meta name="description" content="Most onboarding programs dump information on new hires instead of building context. Here's a better approach.">
<meta name="keywords" content="onboarding, engineering-culture, developer-experience">
<meta name="date" content="2026-04-01">
<style>
body {
max-width: 680px;
margin: 2rem auto;
padding: 0 1rem;
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.7;
color: #1a1a1a;
}
h1 { font-size: 2rem; margin-bottom: 0.25rem; }
h2 { margin-top: 2rem; }
.meta { color: #666; font-size: 0.9rem; margin-bottom: 2rem; }
a { color: #0366d6; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<article>
<h1>Why Developer Onboarding Is Broken</h1>
<p class="meta">By Your Name · April 1, 2026</p>
<p>Your opening hook goes here — a story, a bold claim, or a question that makes the reader want to keep going.</p>
<h2>The Problem</h2>
<p>...</p>
<h2>A Better Approach</h2>
<p>...</p>
<h2>What I'd Do Differently</h2>
<p>...</p>
<h2>Wrapping Up</h2>
<p>A closing thought and call to action.</p>
</article>
</body>
</html>Use these templates as starting points — adapt the structure and voice to match each writer's style and topic.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.