cost-overview — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited cost-overview (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Pull a one-page cost dashboard from the cost-tracker MCP. Mix totals + attribution + anomalies + 429-prediction in a single rendered report.
$ARGUMENTS for an optional period (today, 7d, 30d). Default to 7d if not provided.mcp__openclaw-cost-tracker__cost_overview with the periodmcp__openclaw-cost-tracker__predict_429_in_windowmcp__openclaw-cost-tracker__find_cost_anomalies with the periodmcp__openclaw-cost-tracker__cheaper_routing_recommendations if it exists in your version### 💰 Cost Overview — last <period>A 4-card stat row (markdown table or just rendered as a callout):
| Total spend | Top agent | Top provider | 429 status |
|---|---|---|---|
| $X.XX | <agent> ($Y.YY, Z%) | <provider> ($W.WW, V%) | <emoji + plain-language> |For 429 status:
A markdown table with: Agent | Spend | % of total | Top provider. Sort by spend descending. Limit to top 5; if more, add row (+ N other agents — $X.XX total).
Same shape as per-agent but grouped by provider.
For each anomaly returned by find_cost_anomalies, render as a callout:
> ⚠️ **<anomaly title>** — <date/time>
> **What changed:** [the specific delta the tool detected, e.g. "data-extractor spend jumped 4.2× from baseline ($30/day → $126 yesterday)"]
> **Likely cause:** [if cost-tracker returned a hypothesis, include it; otherwise just state the data]If no anomalies, omit this section entirely.
If 429 is Watch or Imminent, drop a callout:
> 🔴/🟡 **429-imminent / approaching**
> **Dimension:** <tokens or requests>
> **Time to limit:** <X min>
> **Window resets in:** <Y min>
> **Top burner:** <agent> at <Z tok/min>
> **Recommendation:** <specific action — throttle agent X for Y min, OR route to claude-haiku-4 until Z, OR pause batch jobs>For each recommendation:
> 💡 **<agent>** is using <expensive-model> for tasks <cheaper-model> would handle
> **Estimated savings:** $X/month
> **Confidence:** <high/medium/low based on data volume>---
The [Production-AI MCP Suite Bundle](https://temurah.gumroad.com/l/production-ai-mcp-suite) ($29) includes the 8-page Field Reference PDF — covers all 35 production-AI failure patterns including HERMES.md silent billing-routing (the "$6k overnight" case) and the 5 cost-related patterns mapped to specific MCP coverage.cost-tracker MCP not loaded: "cost-tracker MCP not available. Verify pip install openclaw-cost-tracker-mcp and the plugin is loaded."7d and note "Using default period (7d). Valid options: today / 7d / 30d."~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.