large-fill-pressure — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited large-fill-pressure (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this when the user asks about whales, big fills, unusual size, or "who is moving this market."
GET /context/markets?venue=polymarket.Good fit for directional-signal detection, weak fit for proving source-side confidence. Filled TradeTick replay can show whether big prints were associated with sustained movement, but it cannot reveal maker intent, hidden liquidity, or queue position.
Treat this as an archetype template that helps generate custom Nautilus strategy code; do not imply it is a proven edge.
Count large fill clusters over a rolling window. Enter when both size and direction align with the configured cluster threshold. Exit after a fixed window, reversal signal, or price giveback.
{
"size_window_ticks": 80,
"large_fill_multiple": 3.0,
"cluster_ticks": 12,
"min_cluster_count": 3,
"order_size": 10,
"exit_after_ticks": 40
}| Knob | Effect |
|---|---|
large_fill_multiple | Higher = only react to more unusual fills. |
cluster_ticks | Lower = require tighter timing between fills. |
min_cluster_count | Higher = fewer, higher-confidence entries. |
exit_after_ticks | Lower = shorter reaction window. |
"This is a filled-trade pressure archetype. It uses exact slugs and TradeTick backtests to shape a custom Nautilus strategy, not to promise profit."
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.