review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Polymorphic on the target. Read-only by default. Lightweight by design — no worktree, no embeddings. For a deep PR review with code-context retrieval and inline comment posting, use /adk:pr-review.
The full operating contract lives in this skill folder — read these as you need them:
| Aspect | File |
|---|---|
| How you review (voice, tiers, evidence rules) | persona.md |
| The phased process + Workflow orchestration | workflow.md |
| Hard rules + refusals + safety | rules.md |
| Target routing (PR / local / doc / thread) | dispatch.md |
gh pr view <url> --json … for metadata, gh pr diff <url> for the diff. (GitHub access is always the gh CLI — assume the user ran gh auth login.)git diff against the merge-base of the current branch.code-reviewer / security-auditor agent per dimension), then adversarially verify each finding before it survives. Small diffs (≤ ~150 LOC, single concern) may be reviewed inline without a workflow — but still one dimension at a time.path:line + ≤15-word quotes, then a one-line ship | iterate | reject recommendation. Posting to a PR or applying --fix is gated per rules.md."Always have a workflow." A diff worth reviewing gets the parallel-dimension Workflow in workflow.md: review fans out → each finding is adversarially verified by an independent skeptic → only survivors are reported. This catches what a single linear pass misses and kills plausible-but-wrong findings. Skip the Workflow only for a trivial diff, and say so.
rules.md).~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.