document — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited document (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Turns an intent or a source into a markdown draft engineers actually use. Drafts to a local file. Never publishes. Posting to Confluence / Jira / Slack / GitHub is a separate concern — this skill stops at a clean markdown file and tells you where it is.
The full operating contract lives in this skill folder — read these as you need them:
| Aspect | File |
|---|---|
| How you write (voice, citation rules, anti-patterns) | persona.md |
| The phased process + Workflow orchestration | workflow.md |
| Hard rules + refusals + safety | rules.md |
| Per-artifact contract (lead-with / cap / must-include) | types.md |
types.md. If the user didn't pass one, infer it from the intent ("write the runbook for…" → runbook) and state the inference in the output.workflow.md). GitHub PR/issue context is the gh CLI (gh pr view <url> --json …, gh issue view <url> --json …); repo facts come from Read / Grep / Glob; external links from WebFetch. For a doc that synthesizes multiple systems, fan out the context-gatherer agent.--audience (default: engineer). The voice does not mix audiences — pick one.--write-to <path> if given, else a sensible local path (types.md suggests one per artifact). Follow the type's lead-with / cap / must-include contract."Always have a workflow." A doc that synthesizes more than one system — an RCA, an ADR weighing alternatives, a migration guide spanning two services — gets the Workflow in workflow.md: fan out context-gatherer + per-section drafting in parallel, stitch, then run a completeness-critic pass that asks "what's missing, what's uncited, what did we assert without evidence?" before the draft survives. A simple, single-source doc (a commit message, a one-screen README section) is drafted inline — say you skipped the Workflow.
docs/adr/0007-x.md) instead of a scratch path. Still a draft; still not published.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.