lo-sla-monitor — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited lo-sla-monitor (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Tracks commitments and SLAs made to customers -- from formal contractual obligations to informal promises made in calls and emails. Surfaces upcoming deadlines, flags breaches before they happen, and maintains an accountability record. Part of the Lifecycle Orchestration pillar.
This is a tracking and alerting skill. It monitors commitments against deadlines and surfaces deviations. It does not make commitments, renegotiate deadlines, or communicate with customers about breaches. Those are human decisions.
| Type | Source | Example | Tracking Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contractual SLA | Contract terms | 99.9% uptime, 4-hour P1 response time | Automated from support/platform data |
| Feature commitment | Sales or CS conversation | "Feature X will be available by Q2" | Manual logging, tracked against product roadmap |
| Action item | Call or meeting | "I will send you the benchmark report by Friday" | Manual logging by CSM or extracted from call transcripts |
| Response commitment | Email or ticket | "I will get back to you within 24 hours" | Automated from email/ticket timestamps |
| Escalation commitment | Escalation process | "Engineering will have a fix within 5 business days" | Manual logging, tracked against internal team |
Commitments enter the system through three channels:
Automated capture:
Semi-automated capture:
Manual capture:
For each active commitment:
| Status | Criteria |
|---|---|
| On track | Deadline >3 days away, no indicators of delay |
| Due soon | Deadline within 3 business days |
| At risk | Deadline within 1 business day and no evidence of completion |
| Overdue | Past deadline, not marked as complete |
| Completed | Owner confirms delivery or automated detection confirms fulfilment |
| Alert | When | To Whom |
|---|---|---|
| Reminder | 3 business days before deadline | Commitment owner (CSM or internal team) |
| Urgent | 1 business day before deadline, if not yet complete | Commitment owner + CSM (if owner is not the CSM) |
| Breach | Deadline passes without completion | CSM + manager. Include commitment details, customer, and elapsed time |
For each account, maintain a running record of all commitments:
This record feeds into QBR preparation, renewal assessment, and escalation context.
Active commitment record (per account):
{
"account_id": "string",
"active_commitments": [
{
"id": "commit-001",
"description": "Send benchmark report comparing account usage to segment peers",
"owner": "Jane Doe (CSM)",
"created": "2026-03-07",
"deadline": "2026-03-14",
"status": "on_track",
"source": "QBR call on 2026-03-07",
"days_remaining": 4
},
{
"id": "commit-002",
"description": "Engineering fix for API latency issue",
"owner": "Engineering (via escalation)",
"created": "2026-02-28",
"deadline": "2026-03-10",
"status": "at_risk",
"source": "Escalation TICKET-4521",
"days_remaining": 0
}
],
"accountability_summary": {
"commitments_90d": 12,
"completed_on_time": 10,
"completion_rate": 0.83,
"currently_overdue": 0,
"currently_at_risk": 1
}
}CSM commitment dashboard (weekly):
{
"csm": "Jane Doe",
"week_of": "2026-03-10",
"due_this_week": 4,
"at_risk": 1,
"overdue": 0,
"completion_rate_30d": 0.91,
"accounts_with_overdue_items": [],
"top_priority": {
"account": "Acme Corp",
"commitment": "Engineering fix for API latency",
"deadline": "2026-03-10",
"status": "at_risk"
}
}| Decision Point | Context Provided | What the Human Decides |
|---|---|---|
| At-risk commitment (approaching deadline) | Commitment details, owner, customer context | Whether to push the owner, renegotiate the deadline with the customer, or escalate |
| Breached commitment | Breach details, customer impact, communication history | How to communicate the breach to the customer, what remediation to offer |
| Pattern of breaches on an account | Accountability record, breach history | Whether there is a systemic issue (over-promising, under-resourced, product gap) |
| Internal team not delivering | Commitment details, internal owner, days overdue | Whether to escalate internally, adjust the commitment, or find an alternative |
Required:
Strongly recommended:
bi-account-brief (for customer context when a breach occurs)references/commitment-capture.md -- Patterns for extracting commitments from different sources~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.