sprint-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited sprint-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Generate a comprehensive sprint review with metrics, story breakdown, and recommendations.
sprints(method: "get_current") — current sprint + progress + readinessfeatures(method: "list") — all features (filter by sprint_id)ai(method: "get_next_work") — recommended prioritiesFrom the sprint data, compute:
## Sprint Review: [sprint name]
### Progress
[done]/[total] stories ([percentage]%) | [points delivered]/[total points] SP
[=========> ] 55% complete
### By Status
- Done: [count] stories
- In Progress: [count] stories
- Todo: [count] stories
### Feature Breakdown
| Feature | Stories | Done | Status |
|---------|---------|------|--------|
| [name] | [total] | [done] | [on track / at risk] |
### Blockers & Risks
- [any stories stuck in in_progress for too long]
- [features with 0% progress]
- [dependencies not met]
### Recommendations
- [AI-recommended next work]
- [stories to deprioritize if sprint is at risk]
- [carry-over items for next sprint]If the user says "close the sprint" or "end sprint":
sprints(method: "update", status: "completed") with retrospective data~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.