ctx-tech-regulation — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited ctx-tech-regulation (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When analyzing PM contracts about: tech company regulation, antitrust, AI policy, TikTok, crypto regulation, Section 230, app bans.
Inject silently. Use to inform analysis.
Two agencies share jurisdiction:
Case timeline: DOJ/FTC investigation → complaint filed → trial (12-18 months) → possible remedies (breakup, behavioral, consent decree) → appeals (12-24 months).
Current major cases: Google (search monopoly, ad tech), Apple (app store), Meta (social media acquisitions), Amazon (e-commerce).
PM implication: Antitrust cases take YEARS. "Will Google be broken up by 2027?" has a structural prior of LOW because even if DOJ wins, remedy proceedings take additional years. Behavioral remedies (changing practices without breakup) are much more common than structural ones (breakup).
TikTok situation (as of 2025-2026):
PM framework: This is an EXECUTIVE ENFORCEMENT question, not a legislative one. The law exists. The question is whether the president enforces it, and that depends on China relations, trade negotiations, and political calculation.
Current state: No comprehensive federal AI regulation in the US. EU has AI Act. Some state-level action (Colorado, California proposals).
Key dynamic: Both parties WANT to regulate AI but disagree on how. This means:
PM contracts on "Will Congress pass AI regulation?" → same 60-vote analysis as any legislation. Default prior: LOW.
Turf war: SEC vs CFTC over jurisdiction. SEC treats most tokens as securities. CFTC wants jurisdiction over spot markets.
Key variable: Whether Congress passes market structure legislation clarifying which agency has authority.
Stablecoin legislation is the most likely to pass (bipartisan interest, both parties want to claim credit, potentially doable through reconciliation if attached to financial legislation).
"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
This shields platforms from liability for user content. Both parties want to reform it but for OPPOSITE reasons:
PM implication: Section 230 reform is legislatively gridlocked precisely because both sides want opposite things. "Will Section 230 be reformed?" → very low probability without a specific, narrow proposal.
For live data on this theme through SimpleFunctions:
# CLI (npm install -g @spfunctions/cli)
sf query "tech regulation" --json --limit 5
sf investigate "tech regulation" --json --limit 5
# HTTP API (free, no auth required for these endpoints)
curl "https://simplefunctions.dev/api/public/scan?q=tech+regulation"
curl "https://simplefunctions.dev/api/agent/world"Reference: <https://docs.simplefunctions.dev>
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.