specstory-session-summary — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited specstory-session-summary (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You will analyze recent SpecStory session history files to provide a standup-style summary.
Argument provided: $ARGUMENTS (default: 5 sessions, or "today" for today's sessions only)
First, check if the SpecStory history folder exists and list recent session files:
ls -t .specstory/history/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -20If no `.specstory/history` folder exists or it's empty, respond with:
No SpecStory session history found in this directory.
>
SpecStory automatically saves your AI coding sessions for later reference. To start recording your sessions, install SpecStory from https://specstory.com
Then stop - do not proceed with the remaining steps.
If sessions are found, continue with the analysis. If the argument is "today", filter to today's date. Otherwise use the number provided (default 5).
Session files can be very large and may contain multiple user requests. Use this chunked reading strategy:
Step 2a: Understand the session structure
First, grep for all user message markers to see the session's scope:
grep -n "_\*\*User\*\*_" <file> | head -10This shows line numbers of user messages, helping you understand:
Step 2b: Read strategically based on structure
offset=0, limit=500tail -300 <file> via Bash grep -E "(Edit|Write)\(" <file>Step 2c: For multi-request sessions
If the grep in 2a shows multiple user messages at distant line numbers (e.g., lines 50, 800, 1500), this indicates multiple distinct tasks. For these sessions:
offset=795, limit=100)Extract this information:
_**User**_ blocksPresent each session as:
### {YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM} - {Brief Title from Main Goal}
**Goal**: {1 sentence summarizing what user wanted}
**Outcome**: {emoji} {Brief result description}
**Files**: {comma-separated list, or "None" if research only}
**Key insight**: {Notable decision or learning, if any}For multi-task sessions, adjust the format:
### {YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM} - {Overall Theme or Primary Task}
**Tasks**:
1. {First task} - {outcome emoji}
2. {Second task} - {outcome emoji}
**Files**: {comma-separated list}
**Key insight**: {Notable decision or learning, if any}After all sessions, add:
---
**Patterns**: {Note any recurring themes, files touched multiple times, ongoing work}
**Unfinished**: {Any sessions that ended with TODOs, blockers, or incomplete work}## Session Summary (Last 3 Sessions)
### 2025-10-18 11:42 - Investigate Chat CRDT Storage
**Goal**: Understand why chat index CRDT doesn't contain the thread
**Outcome**: 📚 Explained dual storage design for offline/online sync
**Files**: threads.json, crdt-debug/4X/, crdt-debug/aT/
**Key insight**: Two storage layers (CRDT + JSON) serve different sync scenarios
### 2025-10-18 11:09 - Address Code Review Comments
**Goal**: Fix clarity issues from code review
**Outcome**: ✅ Refactored normalizeChatIndexDoc function
**Files**: chat.go, automerge-bridge.js
**Key insight**: Replaced complex normalization with toPlainString helper
### 2025-10-11 14:30 - Automerge Architecture Deep Dive
**Goal**: Document how Automerge docs are constructed temporally
**Outcome**: 📚 Research complete, walkthrough provided
**Files**: automerge-bridge.js, document.go (read only)
---
**Patterns**: 3 sessions focused on CRDT/chat subsystem; automerge-bridge.js touched repeatedly
**Unfinished**: None detected~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.