flow-run — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited flow-run (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Execute the workflow in SPECS/COMMANDS/FLOW.md exactly, without skipping required steps unless the workflow itself explicitly allows skipping.
Collect these before starting:
P5-T2) and short description.REVIEW_{subject}.md.If the task identifier is unknown, determine it from SPECS/Workplan.md and SPECS/INPROGRESS/next.md during SELECT.
Apply these rules throughout execution:
SPECS/COMMANDS/FLOW.md at the beginning and treat it as the source of truth.BRANCH -> SELECT -> PLAN -> EXECUTE -> ARCHIVE -> REVIEW -> FOLLOW-UP -> ARCHIVE-REVIEW -> PR -> CI-REVIEW.flow-primitive-commit skill for every commit checkpoint — stage only task-relevant files and use present-tense FLOW message patterns.pytest, ruff check src/, mypy src/ if configured, pytest --cov with coverage >= 90%).SPECS/INPROGRESS/ and SPECS/ARCHIVE/.gh-create-pr skill to open a pull request from the feature branch into main.main is up to date.feature/{TASK_ID}-{short-description} if not already on the correct feature branch.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Branch for {TASK_ID}: {short description}.SPECS/Workplan.md (optionally with python scripts/pick_next_task.py).SPECS/INPROGRESS/next.md with selected task metadata.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Select task {TASK_ID}: {TASK_NAME}.SPECS/INPROGRESS/{TASK_ID}_{TASK_NAME}.md.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Plan task {TASK_ID}: {TASK_NAME}.SPECS/INPROGRESS/{TASK_ID}_Validation_Report.md.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Implement {TASK_ID}: {brief description of changes}.flow-primitive-commit incrementally after each logical unit of work.SPECS/COMMANDS/ARCHIVE.md workflow.SPECS/ARCHIVE/{TASK_ID}_{TASK_NAME}/.SPECS/INPROGRESS/next.md and SPECS/Workplan.md are updated.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Archive task {TASK_ID}: {TASK_NAME} ({VERDICT}).SPECS/COMMANDS/REVIEW.md.SPECS/INPROGRESS/REVIEW_{subject}.md.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Review {TASK_ID}: {short subject}.SPECS/COMMANDS/PRIMITIVES/FOLLOW_UP.md.SPECS/Workplan.md.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Follow-up {TASK_ID}: {short subject}.REVIEW_{subject}.md to SPECS/ARCHIVE/_Historical/ or relevant task folder.SPECS/ARCHIVE/INDEX.md.flow-primitive-commit skill — commit message pattern: Archive REVIEW_{subject} report.gh-create-pr skill to open a pull request from the feature branch into main.{TASK_ID}: {TASK_NAME}.gh-pr-results-review skill to inspect CI outcomes on the PR.Consider the run complete only when all are true:
SPECS/INPROGRESS/ and/or SPECS/ARCHIVE/.flow-primitive-commit skill with FLOW message patterns.main was opened via the gh-create-pr skill.gh-pr-results-review skill and all failures resolved.Use this skill when requests look like:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.