requirements-qa — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited requirements-qa (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
.cursor/rules/project-context.mdc or AGENTS.md. Read it first.| Category | Meaning |
|---|---|
[invented] | Claim in master doc with no source citation |
[conflict] | Two source docs disagree on the same point |
[open] | Question not yet answered in any source |
[duplicate] | Same content repeated across multiple docs unnecessarily |
[stale] | Content that existed in an old version but no longer matches current source |
[invented] §3.2 — "daily batch at midnight" has no source in any PDF
[conflict] §4 vs PDF-2 p.8 — field count differs (75 vs 72 fields)
[open] §8.1 OD-3 — Cognida role/ownership still unresolved
[duplicate] understanding.md §2 repeats master.md §3.1 verbatimReport all findings before making any edits.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.