minimal-diff-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited minimal-diff-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
git diff # unstaged
git diff --cached # staged
git diff HEAD # bothRead original files at changed lines for context before judging.
| Category | Flag if |
|---|---|
| Scope creep | Files touched that are unrelated to the stated task |
| Convention drift | Naming, imports, or style diverge from surrounding code |
| Unrequested abstractions | New classes, helpers, or layers added without being asked |
| Debug code | console.log, print(, debugger, breakpoint(), TODO in changed lines |
| Doc drift | Public API or interface changed but no corresponding doc update |
| Test gap | Behavior-changing code with no test added or updated (flag only, not block) |
[scope-creep] src/utils.py:45 — touches unrelated date formatter
[convention] api/routes.ts:12 — uses snake_case; surrounding code uses camelCase
[debug] app/main.go:88 — print statement left in~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.