crossframe-notebook — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited crossframe-notebook (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
crossframe-suite routes explicit CrossFrame work into notes for books, theories, articles, excerpts, bidirectional reading, absorption, or conflict mapping.This AAS-ready copy preserves the original CrossFrame skill body below. Chinese remains the canonical semantic layer; English metadata is only for discovery, installation, and repository review.
crossframe-suite routing; do not apply it as a generic default reasoning layer.本 skill 不独立触发。 所有 CrossFrame 任务统一从 crossframe-suite 入口调度。用户无需直接调用本 skill;suite 根据路由规则在需要时自动加载。如果读书研究之后要成文、教学、辩论或评审,先读取 ../crossframe-suite/SKILL.md 做总调度;本 skill 只负责读书/理论/文章研究笔记。
本 skill 是 crossframe 的平行研究笔记入口,不替代 crossframe 做现实诊断,也不替代 crossframe-essay 写文章。中文为权威语义;英文只用于 skill id、文件名、接口和必要对外说明。
每次触发后先读取相邻 canonical 资料,而不是复制它们的正文:
../crossframe/SKILL.md../crossframe/references/read-routing-map.md../crossframe/references/continuity-bundles.md,并按需使用 ../crossframe/worksheets/source-continuity-check.md;未完成联读时只能降档。../crossframe/templates/read-state-capsule.md 规定的 v5-read-state-capsule,并在高责任、公共、AI/过程性产物、生命周期、无法退出主体或文章输出场景执行 ../crossframe/worksheets/source-anchor-integrity-check.md。如果胶囊缺失,回到 ../crossframe/SKILL.md 补齐;本 skill 不重新发明源路由。protocols/notebook-reading-protocol.mdprotocols/bidirectional-reading-protocol.mdprotocols/source-integrity-protocol.mdtemplates/、references/ 和 examples/不要把 canonical 全文搬进本 skill 输出。只引用必要规则名、概念名和相对路径。
CrossFrame Notebook 做的是双向阅读:
它不是“读书摘要器”,也不是“拿 CrossFrame 套文本”。如果用户只给了标题或模糊记忆,必须标明来源边界;不能伪造页码、原句、出处或作者观点。
一次合格笔记至少包含:
用户要求极简时,也必须保留“关联 / 不同 / 可吸收 / 不可吸收 / 反馈问题”的最小骨架。
以下情况一旦出现,要主动纠偏或判定当前输出不合格:
默认使用 templates/research-notebook.md。需要记录来源时追加 templates/source-ledger.md。
输出语气要像研究笔记:清楚、克制、可复查。可以有判断,但判断必须绑定文本证据、来源边界和可撤回条件。
protocols/notebook-reading-protocol.md:读书/理论/摘录笔记流程。protocols/bidirectional-reading-protocol.md:双向互读协议。protocols/source-integrity-protocol.md:引用、页码、版本和来源边界。references/absorption-taxonomy.md:关联、不同、冲突、吸收、不可吸收、反馈问题分类。references/notebook-quality-gates.md:合格笔记质量闸。references/source-boundary-rules.md:来源可信度和不可伪造规则。templates/research-notebook.md:默认研究笔记模板。templates/source-ledger.md:来源台账模板。examples/:书籍理论、文章摘录、公共理论和失败样例。evals/crossframe-notebook-smoke-tests.md:smoke tests。~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.